Listen to Episode 15 on Soundcloud and on Spotify!
This episode explores how the impact of EU external action is assessed and evaluated. Through interviews with Monitoring and Evaluation Focal Points from DG INTPA, DG ENEST, DG MENA, and FPI, the Capacity4dev team sheds some light on roles and responsibilities, common challenges, and practical tips for improving results reporting.
Click on the image to read some of the tips the M&E Focal Points shared in this podcast episode:
Find us on Spotify as well!
(1)
Log in with your EU Login account to post or comment on the platform.
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you for the recent podcast episode on roles and responsibilities, common challenges, and practical tips for improving results reporting.
We are currently in the process of conducting full proposal evaluation for our new call (Grant), and I believe this is an ideal time for us, as the evaluation focal point and OMs, to clarify some unclear areas.
Key Question:
Is it advisable to agree with successful tenderers (who are selected for contracting) when sending the awarding letter to revise the accepted Logical Framework by replacing existing indicators with EU corporate indicators where appropriate? Ofcourse, this would be done without challenging the original decision of the action, ideally within the first 6 months after contract signature (the sooner the better).
Additional Request:
Is there any official communication for the delegations with clear instructions on this matter? Such guidance would make the process easier for both Operations Managers and/or Evaluation focal points as well as implementing partners.
Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Best regards,