A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops
Discussion details
Published in December 2014 in PLOS ONE, this meta-analysis of the agronomic and economic impacts of GM crops aims to consolidate the existing evidence. Despite the rapid adoption of genetically modified (GM) crops by farmers in many countries, controversies about this technology continue. Uncertainty about GM crop impacts is one reason for widespread public suspicion.Original studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis were identified through keyword searches in ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, EconLit, and AgEcon Search. Studies were included when they build on primary data from farm surveys or field trials anywhere in the world, and when they report impacts of GM soyabean, maize, or cotton on crop yields, pesticide use, and/or farmer profits. In total, 147 original studies were included. On average, GM technology adoption was found to have reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-tolerant crops. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries. The meta-analysis reveals robust evidence of GM crop benefits for farmers in developed and developing countries. Such evidence may help to gradually increase public trust in this technology.
Log in with your EU Login account to post or comment on the platform.