Skip to main content

Discussion details

Created 10 April 2015

In arecent assessmentof the success or otherwise of pooled service delivery initiatives in the Pacific island region, Matthew Dornan and I did not consider the World Bank-ledPacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance pilotas we felt it was too recently established to provide sufficient information for us to evaluate. Being a pilot it has not had a great deal of exposure. However, it has generatedsome recent discussion(unfortunately this item credits the Asian Development Bank with having established the scheme) further to itsrecent payout of US$1.9 millionto the government of Vanuatu in the aftermath of Cyclone Pam. This is the second time the scheme has made a payment to one of the pilot member countries, the first being US$1.27 million paid to Tonga further to the passage of Cyclone Ian during January 2014.

Less positive was the experience of Solomon Islands, who withdrew from the scheme after experiencing two events (the Santa Cruz earthquake and flooding in March 2014), neither of which triggered a payment from the scheme despite the fact that they had very severe impacts on the country socially and economically. This has,it would appear, led to the consideration of increasing the range of responses available to better suit members’ needs. Which is what pilot projects are for – to learn.

http://devpolicy.org/in-brief/is-the-pacific-catastrophe-risk-insurance…