Help & Support

Evaluation methodological approach

Group
public
50
 Members
2
 Discussions
213
 Library items

Table of contents

Check list

CHECK-LIST FOR EVALUATORS

.

Questions Answer
Preparation and design  
Was the field of the analysis clearly delimited?  
Was the group representative of all the stakeholders concerned by the project?  
Has the list of choices to be compared in the multi-criteria analysis been approved by the beneficiaries and experts of the sector?  
Has the content of each activity been clearly explained to group members?  
Has the coherence of the criteria been checked?  
Are the usual types of criteria (economic, environmental, social and political) all represented?  
Implementation  
Have the rules for the setting up of the list of evaluation criteria been clearly explained to the members of the group?  
Has the sensitivity test for the whole criteria system yielded satisfactory results?  
Were mathematical bias relating to the aggregation of the judgements avoided?  
Was each member of the group able to present his/her judgment independently?  

.
CHECK-LIST FOR MANAGERS

.

Questions Answer
Is the use of the multicriteria analysis justified by an evaluation question?  
Was the group representative of all the stakeholders concerned by the project?  
Has the sensitivity test for the whole criteria system yielded satisfactory results?  
Has a performance table been established?  
Has result of the analysis be obtained in a sufficiently reliable way to be useful for the evaluation?