Evaluation methodological approach

Group
public
46
 Members
3
 Discussions
211
 Library items

Table of contents

Check list

CHECK-LIST FOR EVALUATORS

.

Questions Answer
Preparation and design  
Does the bibliography include all the types of documentation?  
Are the questions adapted to the context?  
Have preliminary interviews been conducted?  
Are the sources of information (documentation, interview, monitoring data, direct observation) recorded in the mission reports?  
Implementation  
Have the evaluators met with the experts prior to the panel sessions?  
Did the panel members skills adequately cover all the topics to be studied?  
Were the members of the panel precisely informed about their role and of how the panel should work?  
Has a focus group with beneficiaries been organised?  
Have the evaluators been able to distinguish between personal opinions, interpretations and analyses expressed by respondents?  
Has the triangulation of information underpinned the development of relevant conclusions?  
Is the final report sufficiently understandable and explicit?  
Does the report distinguish the data analysed from the recommendations?  

.
CHECK-LIST FOR MANAGERS

.

Questions Answer
Are the sources of information (documentation, interview, monitoring data, direct observation) recorded in the mission reports?  
Have the evaluators been able to distinguish between personal opinions, interpretations and analyses expressed by respondents?  
Has the triangulation of information underpinned the development of relevant conclusions?  
Is the final report sufficiently understandable and explicit?  
Does the report distinguish the data analysed from the recommendations?