Evaluation methodological approach

Group
public
46
 Members
3
 Discussions
211
 Library items

Table of contents

Check lists

CHECK-LIST FOR EVALUATORS

.

Questions Answer
Preparation and design  
Has the preliminary analysis of the strategies under evaluation been undertaken?  
Has the preliminary analysis of the institutions participating in the preparation and implementation of the strategy and/or the programmes been undertaken?  
Has the list of the relevant documents been established?  
Has the list been submitted to the group in charge of the monitoring of the evaluation?  
Has the dating of the documents been confirmed by their authors or contributors?  
Implementation  
Has a cross-reading of the documentation been conducted?  
Have the missing elements been sought (?) during the test?  
Are hypotheses and uncertainties about the objectives' links clearly stated?  
Did their authors and/or contributors confirm this classification during the test?  
Was there a triangulation of the perspectives?  
Have specialists been consulted by means of written exchanges, if necessary?  

.
CHECK-LIST FOR MANAGERS

.

Questions Answer
Are documentary references and quotations provided in the report?  
Is the list of the documents consulted to establish the diagram complete?  
Do the diagrams appear coherent?  
Are the relations between objectives and effects explicit?  
Are hypotheses and uncertainties about the objectives' links clearly stated?  
Have the external effects been identified?  
Are the constraints and the risks exposed?