Evaluation methodological approach

Group
public
46
 Members
2
 Discussions
210
 Library items

Table of contents

Check lists

.

CHECK-LIST FOR EVALUATORS

.

Questions Answer
Preparation and design  
Has a preliminary assessment of the nature and quality of the information been carried out by the managers of the evaluation?  
If not, has the evaluation team carried out such an assessment, which has been approved by the managers?  
Construction of the diagram  
Have the choices of objectives been clearly identified in the objectives diagram?  
Is the decision-making process clearly established within the decision chain?  
Does the available documentation provide information about rejected objectives and the reasons for these rejections?  
Do the interviews with the authors of the documentation compensate the deficiencies of the written resources?  
Do the questions of interviews logically result from the identification of both the rejected and selected objectives?  
Does the temporary diagram explicitly present the results of choices (objectives selected and rejected)?  
Has the test of the temporary diagram been conducted with the main stakeholders (authors, operators, partners)?  
Have the findings of the test been impartially taken into account in the drawing up of the final diagram?  
Has the diagram been used to properly judge the relevance of the strategy and planning, the quality of the partnership, and the 3Cs?  
Has the reviewed judgement been validated by a panel composed of decisions-makers from the European Commission and independent experts?  
Are the panel's conclusions accurately taken into account?  

.
CHECK-LIST FOR MANAGERS

.

Questions Answer
Does the diagram describe the whole of the objectives and present in an explicit way the rationale of the choices carried out?  
Has the test of the temporary diagram been conducted with the main stakeholders (authors, operators, partners)?  
Has the diagram been used to properly judge the relevance of the strategy and planning, the quality of the partnership, and the 3Cs?  
Has the reviewed judgement been validated by a panel composed of decisions-makers from the European Commission and independent experts? Are the panel's conclusions accurately taken into account?  

.