Does the list of respondents meet the needs of the evaluation's methodology?
Have alternatives been planned by the evaluators in case of cancellations of appointments with the actors?
If any, has the issue of "representativeness" been solved?
In interviews with representative stakeholders belonging to the evaluation's spotted category, has the respondent's " representativeness " been checked?
Do the interview grids cover all the evaluation issues?
Does the design of the interview guides vary sufficiently to meet the needs of different categories of stakeholders?
Implementation
Have the evaluators controlled and checked the information collected?
Does the intended format designed for the debriefing highlight the differences between reliable information and opinions?
Is the diversity of perspectives, expressed by the various categories of stakeholders, explicitly exposed?
.
CHECK-LIST FOR MANAGERS
.
Questions
Answer
Does the list of respondents meet the needs of the evaluation's methodology?
Does the design of the interview guides vary sufficiently to meet the needs of different categories of stakeholders?
Is the homogeneity of the interviews assured?
Does the intended format designed for the debriefing highlight the differences between reliable information and opinions?
Is the diversity of perspectives, expressed by the various categories of stakeholders, explicitly exposed?