Skip to main content
banner WBT

Working Better Together in a Team Europe Approach

Resource
public
EU-official
Updated 15/07/2024 | Working Better Together in a Team Europe Approach through joint programming, joint implementation and Team Europe Initiatives Guidance

Table of contents

4.1 EU Human Rights-based Approach and Working Better Together in a Team Europe approach

EU commitment to promote and protect Human Rights

The EU is founded on a strong commitment to promote and protect human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. In line with the 2019-2024 strategic agenda adopted by the European Council and the 2019-2024 political guidelines for the European Commission, the EU has a strategic interest in advancing its global leadership on human rights and democracy with the aim of bringing tangible benefits to people around the world.

The EU and its Member States will implement a rights-based approach to development cooperation, encompassing all human rights. They will promote inclusion and participation, non-discrimination, equality and equity, transparency, and accountability. The EU and its Member States will continue to play a key role in ensuring that no-one is left behind, wherever people live and regardless of ethnicity, gender, age, disability, religion or beliefs, sexual orientation and gender identity, migration status or other factors. This approach includes addressing the multiple discriminations faced by vulnerable people and marginalised groups.

European Consensus on Development, Art. 16

Since the adoption of the EU strategic framework on human rights and democracy in 2012, the first two EU action plans on human rights and democracy (2012 -2014 and 2015 -2019), the appointment of the first EU Special Representative for Human Rights (EUSR) and the 2019 Council conclusions on democracy, the EU has become more coordinated, active, visible and effective in its engagement in and with third countries and more prominently engaged at multilateral level.

The new Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024 sets out the EU’s ambitions and priorities for concrete action for the next five years in the field of external relations. In line with EU GAP III, the Action Plans reaffirms EU and Member States’ commitment to promote women’s and girls’ full enjoyment of human rights, gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls as a priority across all areas of action. It also underlines the fundamental role played by an independent civil society, an enabling civic space and the support and protection of human rights defenders.

The Action Plan stresses once more the relevance of applying a rights-based approach (RBA) across EU bilateral and regional cooperation, including TEI and joint programming processes. Gender equality is an integral part of the RBA, encompassing the promotion, protection, and fulfilment of all human rights (See Annex 11). Since 2017, with the adoption of the new European Consensus for Development in June 2017, the EU and its Member States committed to implementing an RBA.

Human Rights based Approach (HRBA): the fundamentals.

HRBA is a working methodology based on internationally recognised human rights and which aims to promote and protect human rights in practice. It integrates the norms, standards, and principles of international human rights law into the plans, policies and processes of development programmes and projects. It applies to all sectors, all modalities, and each step of the project cycle: identification, formulation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Within the framework of an HRBA, target groups are considered ‘rights-holders’ with legal entitlements, and government institutions are ‘duty-bearers’, with the obligation to promote, protect and respect people’s human rights. Applying an HRBA to development cooperation should strengthen ‘rights-holders’ to claim their rights and ‘duty-bearers’ to meet their obligations.

The following elements are necessary to apply a rights-based approach to development:

  • Assessment and analysis to identify the human rights claims of rights-holders and the corresponding human rights obligations of duty-bearers as well as the immediate, underlying, and structural causes of the non-fulfilment of rights.
  • Programmes and projects to assess the capacity of rights-holders to claim their rights and of duty-bearers to fulfil their obligations and to develop strategies to build these capacities.

At the heart of an HRBA is the recognition that unequal power relations and social exclusion deny people their human rights and often keep them in poverty. The approach therefore puts strong emphasis on people living in marginalised, disadvantaged, and excluded situations. The HRBA methodology also reminds us that development interventions can have an unintended negative impact in terms of human rights, such as by disadvantaging certain groups, interfering with participation rights and labour rights or contributing to forced displacement. It is therefore important to abide by the ‘do no harm’ principle and carry out the required analysis and mitigation. Moreover, the HRBA working methodology recognises that pursuing human rights objectives is not, in itself, enough. The way these objectives are achieved is equally important. Programmes therefore monitor and evaluate both outcomes and processes.

Human Rights based Approach (HRBA): the five principles.

RBA is underpinned by five working principles to be followed throughout the programme cycle:

Image
Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA) five principles

Figure 21: Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA) five principles
  • Applying all rights (legality, universality, and indivisibility of human rights) - Human rights are universal, inalienable, and indivisible - all human rights, whether economic, political, civil, cultural or social, are of equal validity and importance.
  • In practice: Make the link to the human rights system and use its products (reports, concluding observations, recommendations, etc.) to inform programming: How are human rights standards from treaties or laws – and related recommendations – identified in strategies and used to advance the intended project and programme outcomes (or how could they be)?
  • Participation and access to the decision-making process - Participation is the basis for active citizenship. Active, free and meaningful participation is both a means and an end in itself.
  • In practice: Make sure that participation is more than consultation or a technical step in project preparation. Do rights holders participate in a meaningful way? Are there opportunities for them to influence strategies and the intended outcomes of the intervention?
  • Non-discrimination and equal access - Activities must prioritise the people living in the most marginalised situations and avoid contributing to established patterns of discrimination.
  • In practice: Who are the rights holders? Have they been considered in designing the contribution? Is there unjustified formal or de facto restriction or prevention of particular groups’ access to resources or services or of their participation in decision-making processes? Have efforts been made to include the most marginalised? Is the development intervention accessible for persons with disabilities168 and have efforts been made to ensure equal participation of persons with disabilities169?
  • Accountability and access to the rule of law - Activities must promote accessible, transparent, and effective mechanisms of accountability.
  • In practice: Who are the duty-bearers? Which powers and capacities do they have (and not have) to advance their human rights obligations? Is the proposed initiative accountable towards the rights-holders? Violations need to be prosecuted and victims have the right to adequate redress.
  • Transparency and access to information - Activities must be transparent, with information made available in accessible formats (i.e. in local languages). Transparency is paramount for ensuring the application of the other working principles; without transparency it is not possible to achieve accountability and participation will not be meaningful.

In practice: Is information available in an accessible way to all stakeholders (people involved in the activities)? Are rights holders able to participate in meetings and processes where issues that affect them are discussed?

Human Rights based Approach (HRBA): the toolbox.

The HRBA must be applied in each step of Team Europe approach cycle (from identification to formulation of the Joint Intervention Logic/Joint Response, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation). The HRBA checklist developed in the framework of the HRBA toolbox can help and support EU staff and all stakeholders involved in this process. It consists of a list of questions/elements to guide the implementation of an HRBA in all EU development programmes and projects.

Table 14: Human Rights based Approach (HRBA) Check list (adapted for TEI/JP).
Country/sector analysis

Have immediate and underlying root causes of the main development problems also in terms of HR ben identified in the Joint Analysis?

Is the TEI /Joint Response compliant with the existing relevant legal HR obligations? and with the HR Country Strategy?

  • Which international instruments are binding for the sector?
  • Is the constitutional framework compliant with international obligations?

Does TEI/ Joint Response support the partner country in implementing recommendations that it accepted during the UN Universal Periodic Review?

Does TEI / Joint Analysis clearly identify the rights holders/vulnerable groups with regard to the development challenges identified?

Does TEI/ Joint Response assess the capacity of rights holders/vulnerable groups to claim their rights? Particularly regarding:

  • Awareness about rights and access to information
  • Access to legal/administrative/political services for claiming their rights.
  • Access to basic services
  • Access to decision making processes.

Does TEI/ Joint Response assess the capacity of state institutions to fulfil duties and responsibilities? Particularly regarding:

  • Transparency and openness
  • Legal, political, and social accountability (complaint mechanism)
  • non – discrimination and equality
  • meaningful participation and empowerment
Identification and Formulation

Have potential gaps between human rights standards and day to day reality been identified, including:

  • Human rights concerns raised by international treaty bodies (UPR).
  • Potential negative development trends potentially leading to human rights violations.
  • Evidence of disparities for vulnerable groups.
  • Capacities of local governmental and/or non-governmental partners.

Do the objectives of the TEI Joint Intervention Logic/Joint Response:

  • Ensure that the rights of vulnerable groups are considered?
  • Ensure that the targeted end–users enjoy or participate effectively in the benefits of the selected intervention strategy?
  • Ensure that inequality and discrimination issues are considered?

Does the TEI Joint Intervention Logic/Joint Response:

  • Ensure that the capacities of targeted vulnerable groups are strengthened, with a view to allow them to claim their rights?
  • Aim at strengthening accountability mechanisms, with a view to make both development partners and recipients accountable to rights holders?

Were target groups and/or targeted vulnerable groups involved in the decision-making processes?

Does the proposed TEI Joint Intervention Logic/Joint Response identify human rights indicators?

Implementation

Does the TEI/ Joint Response implementation process respect the working principles of legality/universality/indivisibility, participation, non-discrimination and equality, accountability and the rule of law and transparency?

Do TEI/Joint Response implementation activities ensure non-discriminatory practices and safeguards, particularly with regard to selected vulnerable groups?

Are target groups and/or targeted vulnerable groups involved and consulted during the implementation of activities?

Does the TEI/Joint Response implementation process consider:

  • The relations between target groups and all stakeholders?
  • The capacity gaps identified.

Is the proposed joint strategy transparent in its implementation activities?

Monitoring and evaluation

Do TEI/JP monitoring and evaluation mechanisms effectively foresee specific monitoring with regard to the working principles of the RBA listed above?

Do they allow monitoring of?

  • The impact on vulnerable groups in general? On targeted vulnerable groups?
  • The effectiveness and quality of participation of targeted vulnerable groups?
  • The impact of the selected programme/project on accountability mechanisms?

Do the TEI/JP monitoring and evaluation mechanisms effectively refer to the quality of the implementation process?

Do the sources of information used include disaggregated data, qualitative and quantitative information, assessments, and recommendations provided by national/international HR bodies, CSOs and other development partners?


168 In line with the EU’s obligation under Article 32 of the Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities 169 In line with EU Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030, and Guidance Note on Disability inclusion in EU external action