Results and Indicators
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: A. Enhanced alignment of adopted national legal frameworks and policies with international human rights standards upholding all human rights as essential to human dignity |
SDG 5.1.1 - Whether or not legal frameworks are in place to promote, enforce and monitor equality and non-discrimination (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UN Women, World Bank Group, OECD Development Centre) If not focused on gender equality, SoV include National Databases of Adopted Laws, National Gazette, Ministries' official policies
Additional Information:
SDG 5.1.1 - The SDG indicator is more precise, focusing on gender equality. However, an intervention can use this indicator in a broader sense, covering aspects of equality and non-discrimination entailed in legal frameworks, which go beyond gender. Indicatively, the indicator can be used in order to monitor the existence of human rights-related legal frameworks which cover non-discrirmantion based on race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status such as disability, age, marital and family status, sexual orientation and gender identity, health status, place of residence, economic and social situation. SDG 5.1.1 is based on an assessment of legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality. The assessment is carried out by national counterparts, including National Statistical Offices (NSOs) and/or National Women’s Machinery (NWMs), and legal practitioners/researchers on gender equality, using a questionnaire comprising 45 yes/no questions under four areas of law: (i) overarching legal frameworks and public life; (ii) violence against women; (iii) employment and economic benefits; and (iv) marriage and family. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-01-01.pdf |
Extent to which domestic laws, national action plans or development plans enshrining: i) freedom of expression; ii) freedom of speech; iii) freedom of assembly; iv) right not to be tortured v) right to access public sector information or government data; vi) measures against child labour/ child labour/ Female Genital Mutilation/ gender-based violence
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator which shows whether there are domestic laws, national action plans or development plans enshrining a number of topics. Each intervention should opt among the indicative list for formulation of the indicator that is aligned with its content.
Â
|
|
Number of laws or policies adopted or revised by the State, aligned with ratified International Human Rights Treaties, disaggregated by category of document (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National Databases of Adopted Laws, National Gazette, Ministries' official policies
Additional Information:
This indicator provides information on laws and policies which directly or indirectly protect and promote human rights the alignment of the adopted national laws or national policies with the International Human Rights. National laws should guarantee the enjoyment of the rights enumerated in International Treaties / Conventions. In various countries the legal framework per se does not contain information about the relevant national policy. In case the adopted national polices are part of the adopted law, attention should be given in order to avoid double-counting. In such cases, hence, the law / policy should be counted only once as a result. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Impact: To achieve the full realisation of all human rights for all |
Status of ratification by countries of International Human Rights Treaties
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator provides information on the ratification status of the International Treaty, not the alignment of the national law with the treaty (this is looked at outcome level). National law should guarantee the enjoyment of the rights enumerated in International Treaties / Conventions. The method selected will vary according to the constitutional and legal systems of individual countries. In some countries, once it is ratified at the international level, the treaty may automatically form part of national law (impact level result). In some other countries, the legislature might have to adopt an act of ratification at the national level (outcome level result). In other cases, including many common-law countries, only those provisions of the treaty that are directly incorporated into national law will give rise to enforceable rights and duties.
|
Status of countries' compliance to Civil and Political Rights
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Qualitative information for this indicator can derive from the reports of the Civil and Political Rights Committee, the special procedures of the Special Rapporteurs, the reports of the Human Rights Council, and the Universal Periodic Review (UPR).
|
|
Extent of country's compliance to Economic, Social and Cultural (ECOSOC) Rights (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Universal Human Rights Index https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/
Additional Information:
Qualitative information for this indicator can derive from the reports of the ECOSOC Committee, the special procedures of the Special Rapporteurs, the reports of the Human Rights Council, and the Universal Periodic Review (UPR). |
|
SDG 8.7.1 - Proportion and number of children aged 5-17 years engaged in child labour, disaggregated by sex and age
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Â
SDG indicator 8.7.1 - as of October 2021, this is a Tier II indicator, meaning that methodology and/or data availability have limitations. Please check data availability for your country of interest before using this indicator in a logframe. If data is not available, the EU-funded intervention would need to conduct baseline and endline studies for this indicator. The number of children engaged in child labour corresponds to the number of children reported to be in child labour during the reference period (usually the week prior to the survey). The proportion of children in child labour is calculated as the number of children in child labour divided by the total number of children in the population. For the purposes of this indicator, children include all persons aged 5 to 17. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-08-07-01.pdf
|
|
Number of Human Rights Defenders killed annually
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Central Bank reports
Additional Information:
Number of Human Rights Defenders killed annually. Disaggregated data to be reported upon based on a. countries, b. sex and c. thematic topic covered. If the interventions focus on the status of Human Rights Defenders in countries, then the indicator can also be used at impact level.
|
|
Country score for civil and political rights, according to the Freedom House assessment of Global Freedom (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Freedom House (NGO), https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores
Additional Information:
Freedom House rates people’s access to political rights and civil liberties in 210 countries and territories through its annual Freedom in the World report. Freedom House uses a two-tiered system consisting of scores and status. For the Global Freedom indicator only the score is calculated and provided on the Freedom in the World website. A country or territory is awarded 0 to 4 points for each of 10 political rights indicators and 15 civil liberties indicators, which take the form of questions; a score of 0 represents the smallest degree of freedom and 4 the greatest degree of freedom. For more detail on the methodology, please see: https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: B. Improved effectiveness of the implementation of public policies upholding all human rights as essential to human dignity, in terms of inclusiveness, accessibility, reach, service quality, environmental protection, as well as ensuring equal treatment and gender-responsiveness |
SDG 1.a.2: Proportion of total government spending on essential services (education, health and social protection)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Â
SDG 1.a.2 - The indicator is to be used as part of the human rights - related initiative which touches upon the sectors mentioned in SDG 1.a.2. Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on education (current, capital, and transfers), expressed as a percentage of total general government expenditure on all sectors (including health, education, social services, etc.). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to the government. Disaggregated data to be reported upon based on a. education; b. health and c. social protection. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-0a-02.pdf For more indicators around the specific topics, please visit the different relevant Health, Education, or Social Protection Results Chains and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators (for the Encoder. Kindly note that Each sector has a different hyperlink. Kindly include this in the uploaded version.) SDG indicator 1.a.2 aggregates spending on education, health and social protection. The health and social protection component of 1.a.2 does not yet have meta-data (this is only available for education) as of March 2021, so the EU-funded interventions would need to conduct baseline and endline studies in order to collect primary data. For the social protection element, contributory social insurance should be included in such studies.
|
EU RF- Number of EU funded inititiatives supporting the implementation of political, economic and social reforms and joint agreement in partner countries
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
Â
EU RF Level 2 - The indicator measures the number of implemented reforms as a result of EU funded inititiatives. When the intervention directly supports the implementation of a reform with each own means, it is counted as a result at output level. Disaggregated data to be calculated during results data collection based on the number of countries that have performed these reforms. Disaggregated by thematic topic of reform. Insert the link to the EU RF methodological note, when this is available.
|
|
SDG 3.8.1 - Coverage of essential health services (OPSYS core indicator)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
SDG Reporting on indicator 3.8.1: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal
Additional Information:
Essential health service is defined as the average coverage of essential services based on tracer interventions that include reproductive, maternal, new-born and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and service capacity and access, among the general and the most disadvantaged population. Related to SDG 3.8.1 - Coverage of essential health services (defined as the average coverage of essential services based on tracer interventions that include reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and service capacity and access, among the general and the most disadvantaged population). The indicator is an index reported on a unitless scale of 0 to 100, which is computed as the geometric mean of 14 tracer indicators of health service coverage. For more indicators around the topic of Health, please visit the relevant Health Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-03-08-01.pdf |
|
Percentage of population being aware of their right to access basic health and social services, disaggregated by sex and type of social service
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Percentage of the population being aware of the right to access essential health services (including reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and service capacity and access, among the general and the most disadvantaged population), as well as social services. For more indicators around the topics of Health and Social Protection, please visit the relevant Health Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators
|
|
SDG 1.3.1 under (a) - (GAP III)Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims and the poor and the vulnerable
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
SDG 1.3.1 under (a) - (GAP III) - The indicator reflects the proportion of persons effectively covered by a social protection system, including social protection floors. It also reflects the main components of social protection: child and maternity benefits, support for persons without a job, persons with disabilities, victims of work injuries and older persons. Effective coverage of social protection is measured by the number of people who are either actively contributing to a social insurance scheme or receiving benefits (contributory or non-contributory). For more indicators around the topic, please visit the relevant Social Protection Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-03-01a.pdf
|
|
SDG 1.4.2 - Proportion of total adult population with secure tenure rights to land, (a) with legally recognized documentation, and (b) who perceive their rights to land as secure, by sex and type of tenure
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Database of training beneficiaries, pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information:
SDG 1.4.2 - The indicator measures the results of policies that aim to strengthen tenure security for all, including women and other vulnerable groups. Indicator 1.4.2 covers (a) all types of land use (such as residential, commercial, agricultural, forestry, grazing, wetlands based on standard land-use classification) in both rural and urban areas; and (b) all land tenure types as recognized at the country level, such as freehold, leasehold, public land, customary land. Legally recognized documentation: Legal documentation of rights refers to the recording and publication of information on the nature and location of land, rights and right holders in a form that is recognized by government, and is therefore official. For more indicators around the topic, please visit the relevant Green Deal Results Chains and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-04-02.pdf
|
|
GAP III - Percentage of referred cases of gender-based and sexual violence against women and children that are investigated and sentenced (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Law Enforcement Logs, Official Ministries' data, EU Interventions Monitoring Systems including baseline and endline survey conducted and budgeted by the EU intervention
Additional Information:
GAP III - The indicator measueres the response of the public authorities in relation to their duties to respect, protect and fulfil gender based and sexual violence against women and children that are investigated and sentenced. This indicator is part of the EU Gender Action Plan III available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_284_en_final.pdf |
|
GAP III - Number of cases of gender-based online violence, harassment and cyber-bullying targeting women, men, girls and boys, in all their diversity, reported to the police
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
GAP III - The indicator measures the results of strengthening the capacities and awareness of actors in relation to gender based violence. Individuals may report the violation / abuse of their righg once they are aware of it; at the same time, national authorities' awareness is key to them accepting / registering a report. Disaggregated data are to be reported based on a. sex, b. type of violation. This indicator is part of the EU Gender Action Plan III available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_2…
|
|
Percentage of referred cases of human rights violations that are investigated and adjudicated by the relevant public authorities, disaggregated by sex of the victim (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Law Enforcement Logs, Official Ministries' data, EU Interventions Monitoring Systems including baseline and endline survey conducted and budgeted by the EU intervention
Additional Information:
The indicator measures the response of the public authorities in relation to their duties to respect, protect and fulfil human rights. It aims to monitor the level of accountability and the existence of legal remedies in case of human rights violations against individuals, Human Rights Defenders, CSOs. The results derive by calculating the ratio of the cases that are investigated and adjudicated in relation to the ones have been referred to the authorities. Types of violations may include but are not limited to the following: Gended Based Violence, torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, political rights, discrimination. |
|
Number of human rights complaints regarding human rights violations that are received by the relevant public authorities, disaggregated by type of violation, authority reported upon and adjudicating authority (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Law Enforcement Logs, Official Ministries' data, EU Interventions Monitoring Systems including baseline and endline survey conducted and budgeted by the EU intervention
Additional Information:
The indicator measures the response of the public authorities in relation to their duties to respect, protect and fulfil human rights. It aims to monitor the level of accountability and the existence of procedures that allow for the proper referral, reception and completion of complaints that are related to human rights violations, as these are referred to the relevant authorities. Types of violations may include but are not limited to the following: Gended Based Violence, torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, political rights, discrimination. |
|
Number of policies and measures that support diversity of the media by encouraging community programming for marginalised groups (indigenous peoples, migrants and refugees, etc.)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Â
Countries are required to report to UNESCO on the 2005 Convention. They do so through periodic reports collected here https://en.unesco.org/creativity/governance/periodic-reports In the future, this information will also be available through the 2030 Culture Indicators.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: C. Improved equality, inclusion, respect and engagement of people in all their diversity in all spheres of public and private life |
SDG 16.b.1: Proportion of population reporting having personally felt discriminated against or harassed in the previous 12 months on the basis of a ground of discrimination prohibited under international human rights law
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
SDG 16.b.1 - This indicator is defined as the proportion of the population (adults) who self-report that they personally experienced discrimination or harassment during the last 12 months based on ground(s) prohibited by international human rights law. International human rights law refers to the body of international legal instruments aiming to promote and protect human rights, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and subsequent international human rights treaties adopted by the United Nations. Discrimination is any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference or other differential treatment that is directly or indirectly based on prohibited grounds of discrimination, and which has the intention or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. Harassment is a form of discrimination when it is also based on prohibited grounds of discrimination. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-0b-01.pdf
|
GAP III - Percentage of women nominated to senior level positions in public sector (e.g. ministries of finance, economic planning, business development) (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. from governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
GAP III - This indicator measures the percentage of women compared to men who are nominated to senior level positions working in the public sector. Interventions should report the type of position where women are nominated, as per the examples of the GAP III indicator in parenthesis. This indicator is part of the EU Gender Action Plan III available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_284_en_final.pdf |
|
GAP III - Percentage of women nominated to senior level positions in private sector (e.g. investment boards / fund management teams, corporate boards, CEOs, business associations, chambers of commerce, cooperative boards, professional bodies, etc.) (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. from governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
GAP III - This indicator measures the percentage of women compared to men who are nominated to senior level positions working in the private sector. Interventions should report the type of position where women are nominated, as per the examples of the GAP III indicator in parenthesis. This indicator is part of the EU Gender Action Plan III available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_284_en_final.pdf |
|
SDG 5.5.2 (GAP III)- Proportion of women in managerial positions (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from International Labour Organization - ILO)
Additional Information:
SDG 5.5.2 (GAP III) - This indicator refers to the proportion of females in the total number of persons employed in managerial positions. It is recommended to use two different measures jointly for this indicator: the share of females in (total) management and the share of females in senior and middle management (thus excluding junior management). The joint calculation of these two measures provides information on whether women are more represented in junior management than in senior and middle management, thus pointing to an eventual ceiling for women to access higher-level management positions. In these cases, calculating only the share of women in (total) management would be misleading, in that it would suggest that women hold positions with more decision-making power and responsibilities than they actually do. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-05-02.pdf |
|
Number of civil society organisations promoting the full participation of people in all their diversity a. in their internal management and b. in their activities and engagement with the public, disaggregated by thematic focus of organisation, representation of actors (e.g. sex, ethnic groups, disability status)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
Â
The indicator measures the role of civil society organisations in promoting equality, respect and inclusion of people in all their diversity in the realm of their internal set-up and activities.
|
|
SDG 5.c.1 (GAP III) - Proportion of countries with systems to track and make public allocations for gender equality and women’s empowerment
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
SDG 5.c.1 (GAP III) - The indicator measures government efforts to track budget allocations for gender equality throughout the public finance management cycle and to make these publicly available. This is an indicator of characteristics of the fiscal system. It is not an indicator of quantity or quality of finance allocated for gender equality and women’s empowerment (GEWE). The indicator measures three criteria. The first focuses on the intent of a government to address GEWE by identifying if it has programs/policies and resource allocations to foster GEWE. The second assesses if a government has planning and budget tools to track resources for GEWE throughout the public financial management cycle. The third focuses on transparency by identifying if a government has provisions to make allocations for GEWE publicly available. The indicator aims to encourage national governments to develop appropriate budget tracking and monitoring systems and commit to making information about allocations for gender equality readily available to the public. The system should be led by the Ministry of Finance in collaboration with the sectoral ministries and National Women’s Machineries and overseen by an appropriate body such as Parliament or Public Auditors. For more detail, please read: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-0c-01.pdf
|
|
SDG 1.4.1: Proportion of population living in households with access to basic services (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat)
Additional Information:
SDG 1.4.1 - Basic Services refer to public service provision systems that meet human basic needs including drinking water, sanitation, hygiene, energy, mobility, waste collection, health care, education and information technologies. The basis cervices indicator will be therefore based on 9 components. These components are captured in various standalone indicators of the SDGs, which means that the concepts and definitions of SDG indicator 1.4.1 will be derived from or are the same as those of these specific SDG indicators. Access to basic services implies that sufficient and affordable service is reliably available with adequate quality. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-04-01.pdf |
|
SDG 5.5.1 under (a) - Proportion of seats held by women in (a) national parliaments (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)
Additional Information:
SDG 5.5.1 under (a) - The proportion of seats held by women in (a) national parliaments, currently as at 1 January of reporting year, is currently measured as the number of seats held by women members in single or lower chambers of national parliaments, expressed as a percentage of all occupied seats. National parliaments can be bicameral or unicameral. This indicator covers the single chamber in unicameral parliaments and the lower chamber in bicameral parliaments. It does not cover the upper chamber of bicameral parliaments. Seats are usually won by members in general parliamentary elections. Seats may also be filled by nomination, appointment, indirect election, rotation of members and byelection. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-05-01a.pdf |
|
SDG 5.5.1 under (b) - Proportion of seats held by women in (b) local governments (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UN Women)
Additional Information:
SDG 5.5.1 under (b) - Indicator 5.5.1(b) measures the proportion of positions held by women in local government. It is expressed as a percentage of elected positions held by women in legislative/ deliberative bodies of local government. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-05-01b.pdf |
|
SDG 16.7.1 under (a) - Proportions of positions in national and local institutions, including (a) the legislatures; (b) the public service; and (c) the judiciary, compared to national distributions, by sex, age, persons with disabilities and population groups (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU)
Additional Information:
SDG 16.7.1 under (a) - The first sub-component of indicator 16.7.1 focuses on positions in national legislatures held by individuals of each target population (sex, age, persons with disabilities, and contextually relevant population groups). The legislative sub-component of indicator 16.7.1 aims to measure how representative of the general population are the individuals occupying key decision-making positions in national legislatures. More specifically, this indicator measures the proportional representation of various demographic groups (women, age groups) in the national population amongst individuals occupying the following positions in national legislatures: (1) Members, (2) Speakers and (3) Chairs of permanent committees in charge of the following portfolios: Foreign Affairs, Defence, Finance, Human Rights and Gender Equality. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-07-01A.pdf |
|
SDG 16.7.1 under (b) - Proportions of positions in national and local institutions, including (a) the legislatures; (b) the public service; and (c) the judiciary, compared to national distributions, by sex, age, persons with disabilities and population groups (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UNDP Oslo Governance Centre)
Additional Information:
SDG 16.7.1 under (b) - This indicator is focused only on the public service sub-component of indicator 16.7.1. It measures representation in the public service with respect to the sex, age, disability and population group status of public servants, and assesses how these correspond to the proportion of these groups in society as a whole. More specifically, this indicator measures the proportional representation of various demographic groups (women, youth, persons with disability, and nationally relevant population groups) across various occupational categories as well as across two administrative levels (national and sub-national). For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-07-01b.pdf |
|
SDG 16.7.1 under (c) - Proportions of positions in national and local institutions, including (a) the legislatures; (b) the public service; and (c) the judiciary, compared to national distributions, by sex, age, persons with disabilities and population groups (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UNDP Oslo Governance Centre)
Additional Information:
SDG 16.7.1 under (c) - This indicator is focused only on the judiciary sub-component of indicator 16.7.1. It measures representation in the judiciary with respect to the sex, age, disability and population group status, and assesses how these correspond to the proportion of these groups in society as a whole. More specifically, this indicator measures the proportional representation of various demographic groups (women, youth, persons with disability, and nationally relevant population groups) across two key decisionmaking positions in the judiciary (judges and registrars) as well as across three ‘levels’ of courts, namely ‘supreme/constitutional courts,’ ‘higher-level courts’ and ‘lower-level courts’. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-07-01c.pdf |
|
SDG 5.3.1 (GAP III)- Proportion of women aged 20–24 years who were married or in a union before age 15 and before age 18 (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UNICEF ) Household surveys such as UNICEF-supported MICS and DHS have been collecting data on this indicator in low- and middle-income countries since around the late 1980s. Other sources include national censuses or other national household surveys.
Additional Information:
SDG 5.3.1 (GAP III) - This indicator measures the percentage of women aged 20-24 years who were married or in a union before age 15 and before age 18 compared to the total number of women aged 20-24 in the population. Both formal (i.e., marriages) and informal unions are covered under this indicator. Informal unions are generally defined as those in which a couple lives together for some time, intends to have a lasting relationship, but for which there has been no formal civil or religious ceremony (i.e., cohabitation). The indicator captures all formal and informal cohabiting unions. For comparability, age 18 is used as a standard across countries as the common age of majority, though the threshold age between childhood and adulthood varies across countries, as does the legal age at marriage. Based on the content of the intervention, this indicator may also be used at impact level. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-03-01.pdf |
|
SDG 5.3.2 (GAP III) - Proportion of girls and women aged 15–49 years who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting, by age (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UNICEF )
Additional Information:
SDG 5.3.2 (GAP III) - This indicator measures the percentage of girls aged 15-19 years who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting compared to the total number of girls and women aged 15-49 in the population. Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) refers to “all procedures involving partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons". Disaggregated data by age, income, place of residence, geographic location, ethnicity, education. Based on the content of the intervention, this indicator may also be used at impact level. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-03-02.pdf |
|
Number of children aged 5-17 years who are removed from child labour following EU support, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: (i) interim and final reports from implementing organisations, (ii) ROM reviews and (iii) evaluations
Additional Information:
This indicator is relevant for EU-funded interventions providing support with the aim to substantially reduce the global incidence of child labour, in line with the target date of 2025 proclaimed by the United Nations for the full elimination of child labour worldwide. The ILO Convention No. 182 defines the Worst Forms of Child Labour as: (a) all forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery, such as the sale and trafficking of children, debt bondage and serfdom and forced or compulsory labour, including forced or compulsory recruitment of children for use in armed conflict; |
|
Women, Business and the Law Indicator scores:
- Mobility
- Workplace
-Pay
-Marriage
-Parenthood
-Entrepreneurship
-Assets
-Pension
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
The World Bank "Women, Business and the Law" Database measures legal differences between men’s and women’s access to economic opportunities in 190 economies. Thirty-five aspects of the law are scored across eight indicators of four or five binary questions. Each indicator represents a different phase of a woman’s career. The methodology was designed as an easily replicable measure of the legal environment for women as entrepreneurs and employees. We update the data based on feedback from respondents with expertise in family, labour and criminal law. Indicator-level scores are obtained by calculating the unweighted average of the questions within that indicator and scaling the result to 100. Overall scores are then calculated by taking the average of each indicator, with 100 representing the highest possible score.Â
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: D. Improved effectiveness of the actions of Human Rights Defenders, including independent NHRIs, and CSOs operating in safe space for the promotion and protection of human rights |
SDG 16.a.1: Existence of independent national human rights institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights)
Additional Information:
SDG 16.a.1 - This indicator measures the compliance of existing national human rights institutions with the Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles), which were adopted by the General Assembly (resolution 48/134) based on the rules of procedure of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions. It measures the global continual efforts of countries in setting up independent national institutions, through international cooperation, to promote inclusive, peaceful and accountable societies. The creation and fosterage of a NHRI indicates a State’s commitment to promote and protect the human rights provided in international human rights instruments. Compliance with the Paris Principles vest NHRIs with a broad mandate, competence and power to investigate, report on the national human rights situation, and publicize human rights through information and education. For more detail, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-16-0A-01.pdf |
GERF 2.29/ EURF 2.25 - Number of government policies developed or revised with civil society organisation participation through EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
EURF - This indicator refers to the number of government policies and strategies developed with Civil Society Organisation (CSO) participation through EU support. The EU considers CSOs to include all non-State, not-for-profit structures, nonpartisan and non-violent, through which people organise to pursue shared objectives and ideals, whether political, cultural, social or economic. EU-funded interventions that support national or sub-national government with policy-making or support to CSOs to participate in policy or decision making can be considered for this indicator. Policies developed/revised with EU support are counted under this indicator once they are endorsed by the Government or local authorities. For more detail, please see: |
|
Country's score according to the CIVICUS Monitor in relation to country's quality of civic space
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
CIVICUS Monitor combines data from a range of sources and relies on a variety of sources before arriving at a rating for the quality of civic space in each country. Civic space is defined as the respect in law and practice for the freedoms of association, peaceful assembly and expression. Built into each of the three core freedoms is the understanding that a state has a duty to protect civil society, and must go beyond simply refraining from interfering in citizens' enjoyment of their rights. The difference can be calculated based on the annual score difference indicated by CIVICUS Monitor. For more detail, please see: https://www.civicus.org/documents/civicus-monitor-methodology-paper.pdf
|
|
Number of civil society organisations participating in national human rights dialogues (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the presence of civil society organisations in dialogues around human rights topics. The dialogues can be at national, local, regional, or international level. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: E. Improved effectiveness of the global human rights system, including multilateral and regional instruments, mechanisms and partnerships for the promotion and protection of human rights |
Number of implemented Universal Periodic Review (UPR) recommendations, disaggregated by thematic topic covered
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Information for this indicator is to be found in the reports and analytical data of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and under the UPR procedure. Availability of data during e.g. mid-term implementation of recommendations is limited at OHCHR level. However, each UPR cycle includes reporting by the States with reference to the previous cycle. Data for this indicator can be retreived by reports. Tthe break down on the mid-term reports derives by the NGOs, by the NHRI and by the UN (three categories). It is possible in the feature that the UN database is further developed and fed with more information.
|
GAP III - Number of joint statements and commitments made by national and international officials on Gender Equality and Women's Emporment
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
GAP III - This indicator measures the number of joint statements and commitments on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment, that are made by officials representing national or international institutions and entities. Results are to be disaggregated by type of entity represented making the statement (national, international). This indicator is part of the EU Gender Action Plan III available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_2…
|
|
Number of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRI) participating in regional groupings of NHRI and in the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), disaggregated by level (regional or global participation)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of established National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) that participate in groupings of NHRIs at a regional level or at an international level via the Global Alliance of NHRIs.
|
|
Number of meetings at the level of international (UN) and regional mechanisms where NHRIs have access and can voice human rights issues, disaggregatedy by thematic topic tackled during meetings
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the presence of NHRIs' voice at regional and international mechanisms. Results are to be reported upon when NHRIs are allowed to participate in meetings and voice human rights issues either in writing or oral form.
|
|
Number of individual complaints addressed annually by Human Rights monitoring bodies and Regional Courts (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National Human Rights Institutions' (annual) reports, documents, websites; NHRI submissions to regional and international human rights bodies; Other ex-post evaluations on effectiveness
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of human rights related complaints that are addressed by the relevant established national or regional human rights bodies or insitutiions or by the UN monitoring bodies (examples of all my include the African Court of Human Rights , the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the UN specialised monitoring procedures and the committees monitoring the implementation of international treaties etc). |
|
Number of Civil Society Organizations (CSO) reports presented to regional and international human rights bodies per year (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National Human Rights Institutions' (annual) reports, documents, websites; NHRI submissions to regional and international human rights bodies; Other ex-post evaluations on effectiveness
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of reports that the NHRIs officialy send or present in person via their representatives at regional and international human rights bodies. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: F. Improved engagement of the private sector in the respect, protection and promotion of human rights |
GERF 2.6/ EURF 2.20 - Number of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) applying Sustainable Consumption and Production practices with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, baseline and endline surveys, ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF - This indicator refers to the total number of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) that are applying Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) practices with EU support. SCP practices aim to do “more and better with less,” by reducing resource use, degradation and pollution along the life cycle of goods and services, while increasing the quality of life for all. The definition of the MSMEs can be based on the local definition. Where the local definition is not available, definitions from the EU, the World Bank Group or another international organisation can be used. Smallholder farmers (that are typically self-employed and without employees) are not included as microenterprises. Under this indicator the consumption and production policies applied and measured for the Human Rights Results, are the ones that promote, protect and implement human rights standards. For more detail, please see: |
Extent to which private sector entities that provide basic public services, comply with the international and national standards regarding non-discrimination and the provision and quality of services to all (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU intervention
Additional Information:
Qualitative assessment based on whether companies providing utilities and other 'public necessities', such as water, are held to a higher standard under international human rights provisions. Public utilities are subject to four conditions: Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability and Quality. For more detail and questions related to the methodology for qualitative assessment, please see: |
|
Percentage of private sector entities' suppliers screened on the basis of human rights performance
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Database of participants
Additional Information:
|
|
Percentage of public entities screening suppliers on the basis of human rights performance
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the percentage of public entities that impelement a policy of screening their suppliers based on the latter ones' human rights performance. This can be indicated both by signed commitments of the public entities, but also on their Logs about their suppliers.
|
|
Extent to which private sector entities identify, assess, mitigate and communicate the actual and potential adverse human rights impacts with which they are involved, as per corporate Human Rights Benchmark (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
World Benchmarking Alliance Corporate Human Rights Benchmark indicator Chambers Logs, Private entities Standard Operating Procedures, EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems
Additional Information:
Qualitative assessment based on whether private sector entities identify and assess the nature of their actual and potential adverse human rights impacts. The process of assessment should include all internationally recognised human rights as a reference point. The focus of the assessment is on risks to people not to the business. Depending on the size of the business enterprise and the nature and context of its operations, assessments should involve meaningful engagement with potentially affected individuals and groups. Consultation should be done in a manner that takes into account potential barriers to engagement, such as language. In situations where direct consultation is not possible, legally or logistically, business enterprises should consider reasonable alternatives such as consulting credible independent experts. If business enterprises have large number of entities in their value chain, it may be unreasonably difficult to conduct due diligence across all of them. If so, the company should identify general areas where the risks are most significant and prioritize among these. Assessments of impacts should be done at regular intervals and before any major decisions or changes in the operation. Business enterprises should pay special attention to any particular individuals from groups or populations that may be at heightened risk of vulnerability or marginalization. Finally, the company should ensure that all information on the potential impacts of its business operations are shared and accessible to potentially impacted individuals or communities. UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011): , Principle 12, 17, 18 |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: G. New technologies are better harnessing opportunities and addressing challenges for the protection and promotion of human rights |
Score of country regarding the Freedom of the internet, based on the country score on the Freedom House Index
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Freedom House assesses the level of internet freedom in 65 countries around the world through its annual Freedom on the Net report. Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least free) to 100 (most free). Annual reports by the Freedom of the House should be consulted in order to receive more human rights-related information regarding the internet freedom scores.
|
Extent to which the regulatory framework for digital environments and Artificial Intelligence is adopted and aligned with human rights norms (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National legislations, Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator which measures the extent to which new regulatory frameworks around new technologies, digital environments and Artificial Intelligence are adopted and aligned with human rights norms. The combination of international data, as well as designed baseline and endline surveys (with qualitative and/or quantitative data) conducted by the EU interventions can provide the results for this indicator. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 1. Strengthened capacities for the eradication of all forms of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and the death penalty |
GERF 2.30/ EURF 2.26 - Number of victims of human rights violations directly benefiting from assistance funded by the EU (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: (i) interim and final reports from implementing organisations, including governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc (ii) ROM reviews and (iii) evaluations
Additional Information:
EURF - Please note that this indicator includes all victims of all human rights violations. Victims of including but not limited to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment that are benefitting directly from EU support are to be reported under this indicator. A victim is a person whose nationally or internationally recognised human rights and fundamental freedoms have been violated as a consequence of governmental acts or omissions. In addition to the immediate victim, a victim/survivor can also include the family members or dependants of the direct victim/survivor or a person who has suffered harm in intervening to assist. Only victims/survivors directly supported by EU interventions should be included for this indicator. Examples of support provided include medical/ psychosocial support, legal support, financial/ material support, temporary relocation, protection against intimidation or risk of retaliation, online and offline. Sex-disaggregation is relevant. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention. For more detail, please see: |
GERF 2.25/ EURF2.27 - Number of people directly benefiting from legal aid interventions supported by the EU (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
a) EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF - Number of people directly benefiting from legal aid interventions supported by the EU, when affronted with incidents of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and the death penalty. This EURF indicator includes results from all kind of legal aid interventions supported by the EU, and not only relating to torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and the death penalty. For more detail, please see: |
|
GERF 2.23/ EURF 2.29 - Number of state institutions and non-state actors supported on security, border management, countering violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population and human rights (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
a) EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF - The indicator refers to the number of different state institutions and non-state actors supported in their work in safeguarding of human rights. The supported organisations may include the following: State institutions; Elected and appointed civil authorities responsible for control and oversight of these institutions; Criminal justice agencies; human rights bodies such as ombudsmen and independent commissions, etc.; Organisations as part of the international human rights and justice mechanisms, e.g. international courts, international/regional humans rights commissions, etc.; Non-state actors for example, CSOs including professional organisations, non-profit organisations, international non-governmental organisations, media, lobby groups, etc. For more detail, please see: |
|
Number of rehabilitation centers a. established or b.supported for victims of torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, disaggregated by type of authority responsible for running the rehabilitation center
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Disaggregation to be reported upon based on whether the centre is a. established or b. supported. Further disaggregation includes the responsible authority for the running of the centre (national authority, international organisation, CSO).
Each centre is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention. In case a centre is first established and then further supported by the EU-funded intervention, the centre is to be counted only once in the lifetime of the EU-funded intervention.
|
|
Number of people reached via public or targeted awareness campaigns for the eradication of all forms of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, disaggregated by sex, and type of actor wherever possible (coming from state, non-state actors or individuals)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
Public awareness campaigns are the campaigns addressed to the general public. Targeted awareness campaigns include campacigns that have a special focus on the targeted group, e.g. for prison staff, for judiciary workers, for medical personnel, for victims and their families
Information to be provided upon based also on the type of medium used for the public awareness campaign (reach via traditional media, social media, participants in physical or digital events).
|
|
Number of people reached via public awareness campaigns for the eradication of death penalty, disaggregated by sex, and type of actor wherever possible (coming from state, non-state actors or individuals)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of people reached via public awareness campaigns. Information to be provided upon based also on the type of medium used for the public awareness campaign (reach via traditional media, social media, participants in physical or digital events). The reach of onlin media, radio and tv includes inevitably possibility of double-counting people who have been reached by various campaigns of the same EU intervention. In cases where physical presence is reported / counted, each person should be counted once during the lifetime of the EU intervention, even if the same person has participated / attended various campaigns.
|
|
Number of people trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills on the eradication of all forms of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, disaggregated by sex, type of actor represented and skill developed (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems, Evaluation reports after training, Baseline and endline survey to be conducted and budgeted by the intervention.
Additional Information:
The results of the indicator derive from surveys and evaluations made prior to an intervention's training, following the training but also wherever possible and at the end of the intervention's lifetime. The purpose of the indicator is to show not only the result directly after a training session, but also the long lasting actual use of knowledge, methods and tools learnt during the training session. |
|
Number of state and non-state actors trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills on the eradication of death penalty, disaggregated by type of actor and skill developed
(Numeric)
Data Source:
National statistical report
Additional Information:
The results of the indicator derive from surveys and evaluations made prior to an intervention's training, following the training but also wherever possible and at the end of the intervention's lifetime. The purpose of the indicator is to show not only the result directly after a training session, but also the long lasting actual use of knowledge, methods and tools learnt during the training session.
Disaggregation by type of actor includes a. state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons) or b. non-state (e.g. CSOs, local cummnities, local organisations). Each actor is to be counted once throughout the duration of each intervention, even in cases where the same actor participates in different training sessions.
The training provided with EU support may focus on awareness regarding legal frameworks and procedures, rehabilitation methods, tools for awareness raising, advocacy tools and methods etc.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 2. Enhanced support and protection initiatives for Human Rights Defenders, their families and legal representatives |
GERF 2.28 - Number of grassroots civil society organisations benefitting from (or reached by) EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
|
GERF 2.30/ EURF 2.26 - Number of victims of human rights violations directly benefiting from assistance funded by the EU (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: (i) interim and final reports from implementing organisations, including governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc (ii) ROM reviews and (iii) evaluations
Additional Information:
EURF - Number of victims of human rights violations directly benefiting from assistance funded by the EU. It targets Human Rights Defenders (HRDs) that are victims of violations or at risk of human rights violations. Support to HRDs at risk is short-term, and includes legal support, provision of shelter, security training, etc. HRDs are those individuals, groups and organs of society that promote and protect universally recognised human rights and fundamental freedoms, seek the promotion and protection of civil and political rights as well as the promotion, protection and realisation of economic, social and cultural rights. The definition of HRDs does not include those individuals and groups who commit or propagate violence. Sex and age-disaggregation is relevant. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention. For more detail, please see: |
|
Extent to which HRDs are publicly recognised by state and state officials
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Human Rights Defender Index (Justice & Peace) . Proposed measurement scale: ordinal, based on country expert assessment (SOV):
0) No recognition of the work of human rights defenders at all. Their work is often undermined and disregarded.
1) The state does not undermine and disregard the work of HRD; however, it does not publicly recognize their work either.
2) The work of human rights defenders is encouraged and recognized by the state but only in regards to human rights that do not present a threat to the public moral of the state, the government or its religious affiliation (e.g. the state does not support HRD work on LGBT rights, abortion and similar).
3) HRD and their work is publicly encouraged and endorsed by the State and its officials. HRD receive prizes for their work
Â
|
|
Extent to which the need for protection for HRDs at risk is recognised and addressed by national authorities
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator which measures the extent to which the need for protection for HRDs at risk is recognised and addressed by state authorities. The combination of  data and information from national and international reports, as well as designed baseline and endline surveys (with qualitative and/or quantitative data) conducted by the EU interventions can provide the results for this indicator.Â
|
|
Number of Human Rights Defenders (individuals) not in direct risk supported by EU interventions in capacity development for networking, advocacy, security training, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of Human Rights Defenders who are not in direct risk that are supported by the EU for their capacity development (while those who are in risk should be counted under the relevant EURF indicator). Â
Participants can include, for example, journalists, bloggers, media workers and other human rights defenders. A non-exhaustive list of examples includes training courses in risk prevention and security including digital security, regular monitoring and early warning, training, awareness-raising and advocacy in support of pro-human rights defenders initiatives, supporting access to international human rights mechanisms.
|
|
Number of civil society organisations of Human Rights Defenders not in direct risk supported by EU interventions in capacity development for networking, advocacy, security training (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
A non-exhaustive list of examples includes training courses in risk prevention and security including digital security, regular monitoring and early warning, training, awareness-raising and advocacy in support of pro-human rights defenders initiatives, supporting access to international human rights mechanisms. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 3. Strengthened awareness and advocacy capacities for combating all forms of discrimination on any ground |
GERF 2.39 - Number of individuals directly benefiting from EU supported interventions that aim to reduce social and economic inequality (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
Disaggregation by sex. |
GERF 2.25 Number of people directly benefiting from legal aid interventions supported by the EU (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
a) EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF - includes results for people benefitting from all kind of legal aid interventions supported by the EU, in order to combat all forms of discrimination. Legal aid is the provision of assistance to people otherwise unable to afford legal advice, assistance, representation and access to the court systems ensuring equality before the law, the right to counsel and the right to a fair trial. The nature and the scope of what could constitute ‘legal aid’ in practice, who are the providers of legal aid and who are the beneficiaries is very context-specific and varies from country to country. For the purpose of this methodological note, legal aid is understood very broadly, i.e. it includes the provision of legal education, information, advice, assistance as well as legal representation before all types of courts and justice institutions. It also includes support in view of solving a dispute through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms. For more detail, please see: |
|
Number of media representatives trained on reporting human rights violations against women, men, girls and boys in all their diversity, disaggregated by sex and type of medium represented
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the result that an intervention brings at output level via the direct provision of support it offers, to the training of media representatives. Type of medium reprsented may include traditional or modern media (local, national, online, offline).
When the current indicator is relevant for the intervention at output level, the intervention may consider to include at outcome level the  following GAP III indicator: Extent to which human rights violations against women, men, girls and boys are reported in local and national media, disaggregated by sex.
Â
|
|
Number of media representatives trained on reporting free from social norms and stereotypes against women, men, girls and boys in all their diversity, disaggregated by sex and type of medium represented
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the result that an intervention brings at output level via the direct provision of support it offers, to the training of media representatives. Type of medium reprsented may include traditional or modern media (local, national, online, offline).
When the current indicator is relevant for the intervention at output level, the intervention may consider to include at outcome level the  following GAP III indicator: Extent to which reports in local and national media on human rights violations against women, men, girls and boys are free from social norms and gender stereotypes
Â
|
|
Extent to which local and national leaders and influencers, including traditional, religious and community leaders, engage in EU-funded initiatives to challenge and change social norms and discriminatory gender stereotypes (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator on the extent of engagement of target leaders and influencers in the EU-funded intervention's activities. |
|
Number of state and non-state actors (individuals) trained on the use of non-discriminatory rhetoric, disaggregated by sex and sector (public, civil society or private sector) (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations
Additional Information:
Type of actor may include representatives of the state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons, military) or non-state actors (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Each actor (individual) is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even in cases where they participate in various training sessions. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 4. Strengthened capacities for monitoring effectively the implementation of human rights, as well as human rights violations |
GERF 2.29 Number of government policies developed or revised with civil society organisation participation through EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
EURF - The number of EU funded initiatives that aim to strengthen the monitoring and implementation capacities of state and non-state actors, NHRIs and CSOs. If these initiatives are supported by an EU-funded intervention in the realm of promoting and protecting human rights, they are to be reported under this indicator. |
Number of institutions supported by the EU for the development of a. online and b. offline tools monitoring the implementation of human rights, disaggregated by sector (public, civil society, private sector)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the development of online and offline monitoring tools with the support of the EU, for the follow-up of the implementation of human rights. Online and offline tools are to be reported separately. Types of institutions may include state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons, courts), or non-state ones (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Each institution is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
|
Number of monitoring reports prepared by National Human Rights Institutions NHRIs) and national authorities with support of the EU, disaggregated by type of thematic topic covered and type of institution
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
The indicator measures the number of reports that are prepared by NHRIs and other national authorities with EU support. Each report created is to be counted only once throughout the EU intervention's lifetime, even in cases where the same report is to be presented in different entities or fora. The number of reports presented by the NHRIs to regional and international mechanisms and fora, are to be presented at outcome level.
|
|
Number of state institutions supported by the EU for the collection of appropriate information, statistical and research data, to enable governments to formulate and implement policies that protect and respect human rights
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of state institutions that are supported by the EU for collection of data that enables governments to formulate policies. Online and offline data collection methods may be part of this support, as well as capacity building and training sessions. State institutions may include ministries, police authorities, census-related public authorities etc. Each institution is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
|
Number of state and non-state actors (individuals) trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills on human rights principles and contemporary human rights challenges in regional, national or international context, disaggregated (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: database of training participants, pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information:
Each actor (individual) is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even in cases where the same actor participates in different training sessions. The training provided with EU support may focus on awareness regarding legal frameworks and procedures, tools for awareness raising, advocacy tools and methods etc. |
|
Number of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) representatives trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in research and documentation of threats to democratic space, HRDs and vulnerable groups, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Each representative is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even in cases where the same person participates in different training sessions. The training provided with EU support may focus on awareness of legal frameworks and procedures, tools for awareness raising, advocacy tools and methods etc.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 5. Enhanced capacities for the elimination, prevention and protection against all forms of sexual and gender-based violence, harmful social norms and practices |
Number of people reached with EU support in awareness raising initiatives around child marriage, disaggregated by sex, type of actor represented whenever relevant
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Awareness raising initiatives may include training, group discussions, workshop, conferences, campaigns, etc. In such initiatives both men and women are present and data should be disaggregated accordingly. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention. Whenever in these initiatives there are representatives of state or non-state actors, the information should be reported upon in the narrative report.
For more information regarding gender equality, please visit the relevant section under Results and Indicators for Development: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/gender-equality
|
Number of people reached with EU support in awareness raising initiatives around harmful traditional pracitices and Female Genital Munitilation, disaggregated by sex, type of actor represented whenever relevant
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Awareness raising initiatives may include training, group discussions, workshop, conferences, campaigns. In such initiatives both men and women are present and data should be disaggregated accordingly. Each person is to be counted once thoughout the lifetime of the EU intervention. Whenever in these initiatives there are representatives of state or non-state actors, the information should be reported upon.
For more information regarding gender equality, please visit the relevant section under Results and Indicators for Development: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/gender-equality
|
|
Number of health staff trained to support victims of sexual and other violence, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Number of skilled health personnel trained for sexual related or other types of violence. These are competent health professionals educated, trained and regulated to national and international standards. Training may include the provision and and promotion of evidence-based, human-rights based, quality, socio-culturally sensitive and dignified care to women and victims of violence; identification of complications, psychological and rehabilitation support. Each person trained is to be counted once throughout the lifetime of an EU intervention, even if the same person has participated in various training sessions.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 6. Raised awareness on sexual and reproductive health and rights |
Number of persons aged 15-49 who are informed with EU support about their rights regarding sexual relations and reproductive health care, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Â
Number of persons aged 15-49 years (married or in union) who are informed about there right to decide on their own health care and can say no to sexual intercourse with their partner if they do not want. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU intervention, even if the same person participates in various awareness raising initiatives.
|
Number of sexuality education material for public education curricula developped with EU support, disaggregated by age group and disability covered
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of sexuality education material developped with EU support that are to be used for public education. Â
Â
|
|
Number of young people receiving comprehensive sexuality education with EU support , disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights - Human Rights Indicators Interactive Dashboard https://indicators.ohchr.org/
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of people receiving comprehensive sexuality education with EU support. Each person is to be counted once throughout the lifetime of the EU intervention, even if the same person participates in various awareness raising initiatives.
|
|
Number of maternal and newborn health (MNH) professionals trained in line with national and international standards with EU support, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Universal Human Rights Index https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/
Additional Information:
Number of skilled health personnel (generally doctors, nurses or midwives) trained for childbirths and reproductive health and rights. These are competent maternal and newborn health (MNH) professionals educated, trained and regulated to national and international standards. They are competent to: (i) provide and promote evidence-based, human-rights based, quality, socio-culturally sensitive and dignified care to women and newborns; (ii) facilitate physiological processes during labour and delivery to ensure a clean and positive childbirth experience; and (iii) identify and manage or refer women and/or newborns with complications.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 7. Strengthened capacities for the promotion, protection and fulfilment of the rights of every child |
GERF 2.36/ EURF 2.7 - Number of students enrolled in education with EU support: a) primary education, b) secondary education, c) tertiary education (OPSYS core indicator)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
EURF - This indicator measures the number of students enrolled in any grade of primary, secondary or tertiary education, regardless of the child’s age. Students can be included regardless of their age, for a particular school year, in all types of schools and education institutions, including public, private and all other institutions (formal or non-formal) that provide organised educational programmes. Interventions should part of the general secondary system, and can include vocational/technical or re-integration elements. GERF - The indicator measures the EU-funded intervention's contribution to enrolment. Reporting on the indicator should specify the nature of the contribution, whether technical, financial or other, and the level of attribution to the intervention(s). For more detail, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.7_-_education_180808.pdf |
Number of state and non-state actors (individuals) trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, disaggregated by sex and sector
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database or baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Beneficiaries can include representatives of a. state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons) or b. non-state actors (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Each actor is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participate in different training sessions. The training provided with EU support may focus on awareness regarding legal frameworks and procedures, tools for awareness raising, advocacy tools and methods etc.
|
|
Number of children involved in child labour who have been (re)integrated into education or training with EU support, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU Interventions monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
This indicator is relevant for EU-funded interventions providing support with the aim to substantially reduce the global incidence of child labour, in line with the target date of 2025 proclaimed by the United Nations for the full elimination of child labour worldwide. The ILO Convention No. 182 defines the Worst Forms of Child Labour as: (a) all forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery, such as the sale and trafficking of children, debt bondage and serfdom and forced or compulsory labour, including forced or compulsory recruitment of children for use in armed conflict; (b) the use, procuring or offering of a child for prostitution, for the production of pornography or for pornographic performances; (c) the use, procuring or offering of a child for illicit activities, in particular for the production and trafficking of drugs as defined in the relevant international treaties; (d) work which, by its nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out, is likely to harm the health, safety or morals of children. The Convention is available at https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C182. |
|
Number of mechanisms supported by the EU to protect and promote the safety and welfare of children, disaggregated by type of actor
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Frontline Defenders Global Analysis https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/resource-publication/global-analy…
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of mechanisms supported by the EU for the protection and promotion of children's safety and welfare. Such mechanisms may include, for example, hotlines for the support of children, observatories of children's rights, mechanisms for children reporting matters regarding their safety, online tools for faster solution of missing children cases, mechanisms developed for the elimination of children's sexual exploitation etc. Mechanisms can be online and offline.
|
|
Number of recommendations / draft policies developed with EU support that include special reference to the rights of the child and children in vulnerable situations disaggregated by thematic topic covered
(Numeric)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UNESCO-UIS) Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention for health and social protection, in case UN Data continues being not available.
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of recommendations of drafts policies which are developed with EU support so that they include special reference to the rights of the child - in totality or in more specific topic - or reference to children in special and vulnerable situations, such as violence against children, migrant children, children in armed conflicts, or alternative care for children in institutions, Â (for example relating to contact with non-custodial parent and right to maintenance).
Â
|
|
Number of recommendations / draft policies developed with EU support to involve children directly in consultation processes in accordance with their age and capacity
(Numeric)
Data Source:
National Gazettes, National Databases, EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of recommendations of drafts policies which are developed with EU support that are around the best interest of the child and relate to children's involvement in any type of consultation processes. These may include, for example, participation in judicial processes, consultations regarding custody or care placements etc.
|
|
Number of young people and children reached with transparent and accessible publications / awareness raising material developed with EU support on the legal information about the rights of the child, provided in a language they can understand, disaggregated by types of rights covered and accessible formats for people with disability
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention, EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the reach of awareness raising material (publications, reports etc.) developed with EU support, regarding the rights of the child, which are provided in a language that is adapted to their age, social status, disability status etc. so that it becomes easy for them to comprehend.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 8. Strengthened capacities for the integration and implementation of a Rights-Based Approach in programmes |
Number of state and non-state actors supported by the EU for the integration of a Rights Based Approach in strategies and programmes, disaggregated by type of actor (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU interventions monitoring and reporting systems: database of training participants, pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information:
Disaggregation by type of actor includes a. state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons) or b. non-state (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Each actor is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participate in different training sessions. The training provided with EU support may focus on awareness regarding legal frameworks and procedures, tools for awareness raising, advocacy tools and methods etc. |
Number of state and non-state actors (institutions/ organisations/ groups) supported by the EU for the integration of a Rights Based Approach in strategies and programmes, disaggregated by sector
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of state and non-state actors, including institutions, organisations and groups, that are supported by the EU in their efforts to integrate the Rights Based Approach in their strategies and / or programmes. Disaggregation by sector (public, private, civil society). Each actor is to be counted once in the lifetime of an the EU-funded intervention.
|
|
Number of strategies developed with EU support in the private sector to apply a Rights-Based Approach in their policies and Corporate Social Responsibility programmes
(Numeric)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from UN-Habitat and World Bank)
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of strategies developed with EU support in the private sector for the application of the Rights Based Approach in their policies and in their Corporate Social Responsibility programmes. The support may be provided for example via recommendations, consultations, exchange of drafts.Â
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 9. Enhanced regulatory capacities and measures addressing the impacts of climate change, access to a clean environment, land, natural resources, food, water and sanitation on human rights |
GERF 2.38/ EURF 2.8 - Number of individuals with access to improved drinking water source and/or sanitation facility with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Joint Monitoring Programme of WHO/UNICEF https://washdata.org/ EU interventions monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations
Additional Information:
EURF - An improved drinking-water source is defined as one that, by nature of its construction or through active intervention, is protected from outside contamination, in particular from contamination with faecal matter. Improved facilities include piped water into dwelling; piped water into the yard/plot; public tap or standpipe; tube well or borehole; protected dug well; protected spring; and rainwater collection. Improved sanitation facilities are defined as toilets used by only one household meeting certain design standards that prevent human contact with faeces. These include flush/pour flush toilets or latrines connected to a sewer, septic tank, or pit, ventilated improved pit latrines, pit latrines with a slab or platform of any material which covers the pit entirely, except for the drop hole, and composting toilets/latrines. Only access related to fully constructed, rehabilitated or improved facilities which are operational at the time of reporting should be included. Temporary access related to emergency or humanitarian interventions are excluded. Sex-disaggregation is relevant. For more detail, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.8_-_access_to_watsan_180807.pdf |
GERF 2.5/EURF 2.19 - Number of countries and cities with climate change and/or disaster risk reduction strategies: (a) developed (b) under implementation with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc), ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
EURF - This indicator can include the case of a country/city supported in their revision of existing sector policy and strategy documents. Developed strategies are those endorsed by the authorities relevant for the local context. Under implementation is taken to mean cases where EU resources are supporting the implementation of the strategy (all or part). Strategies a) developed and b) under implementation should be reported separately. The same country or city can be reported against both a) and b) if EU support is provided both at development and then later at implementation stage as per above definition. For more detail, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.19_-_climate_change_ddr_strategies_180808.pdf |
|
Number of people trained with EU support, with increased knowledge / skills on right to information, participation and redress about environmental matters, disaggregated by sex and sector (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: database of training participants, pre- and post training tests
Additional Information:
Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participate in different training sessions. |
|
Number of state entities trained with EU support with increased knowledge / skills on the development of measures safegurding people's access to land
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Law Enforcement Logs, Official Ministries' data, EU Interventions Monitoring Systems including baseline and endline survey conducted and budgeted by the EU intervention
Additional Information:
Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participate in different training sessions.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 10. Strengthened regulatory capacities and outreach to provide legal identity for all |
Number of state institutions supported by the EU in developing legal identity registration schemes
(Numeric)
Data Source:
UNESCO MS reporting to 2005 Convention / Goal 1.2. and in the future the 2030 UNESCO Culture Indicators
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of state institutions supported by the EU so that they develop legal registration schemes. State actors may include ministries, local governments, local or national registries, statistical authorities or other relevant entities. The support may include provision of equipment, capacity building, training etc. Each institution is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
SDG 16.9.1 - Proportion of children under 5 years of age whose births have been registered with a civil authority, by age (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU interventions monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations. Government statistics on the registration progress
Additional Information:
Inspired by the SDG indicator 16.9.1, this indicator monitors the number of children whose birth was registered following EU-funded campaigns or reform activities. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 11.Increased engagement opportunities and capacities for the participation in decision-making of CSOs, women, youth, children, people in minorities and people in vulnerable situations |
Number of CSOs supported to participate in a. regional and b. international networks, meetings and UN Conferences, disaggregated by type of geographical area covered (regional or international) and thematic topic of focus
(Numeric)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database (Data derived from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights - OHCHR)
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of civil society organisations that are supported by the EU in their efforts to participate in networking activities, regional and international fora. Each organisation is to be counted once throught the lifetime of an EU intervention, even if the same organisation has been supported for its participation in various networks, meetings, conferences etc.
|
Number of new mechanisms for the involvement of CSOs in the policy process developed with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations
Additional Information:
Possible mechanisms may include, for example, public hearings, appointment of CSO representatives on govt. bodies etc. |
|
Number of people whose skills and/or knowledge are strengthened with EU support for participation in consultations and decision-making processes, disaggregated by sex, age, disability status and population group (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, database of training participants, pre-and post-training tests
Additional Information:
A non-exhaustive list of examples includes support via training, awareness-raising and advocacy in support of children, youth and people in minorities and vulnerable situations for their support in consultations and decision-making processes. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participated in various training sessions or capacity building initiatives. |
|
Number of people trained with EU support who increased managerial positions skills, disaggregated by sex, age, population group and disability status
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures that number of people trained with EU support who increased their managerial skills. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of each EU-funded intervention, even in cases where the same person participates in different training sessions.
|
|
GERF 2.29 Number of government policies developed or revised with civil society organisation participation through EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF - This indicator refers to the number of government policies and strategies developed with Civil Society Organisation (CSO) participation through EU support. Public participation can be defined as a process through which the government actively seeks the opinions of CSOs (interested and affected groups) for a policy initiative. For this indicator, participation of CSOs is defined as including at least one element of the aspects mentioned under the methodological note. Public policies for this indicator are understood in a broad manner, including Government programme, strategies and legislations at national or sub-national levels. For more detail, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.25-_clean-_policies_with_cso_participation-180808.pdf |
|
Number of people supported by the EU support to participate in local, national, regional and international decision-making bodies, disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic and religious background and disability status (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participated in different training sessions. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 12. Enhanced infrastructure measures for access of persons with disabilities to all services and spheres of life |
Number of institutions supported by the EU to develop infrastructure and/or measures for people with disabilities to access public services, disaggregated by type of institution (state, non-state)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
UN Global SDG Database https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database Data derived from UN Women in collaboration with OECD and UNDP
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of institutions supported by the EU so that they develop infrastructure and/or measures for people with disabilities to access public services. Disaggregation by type of institution includes a. state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons) or b. non-state (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Each institution is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
This support should include access to support services. Support services include, home based care services, personal assistance services, assistive devices and technology services, supported living schemes, specific transportation services, etc.
|
Number of media supported by the EU for the use of inclusive communication methods, disaggregated by type of medium
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of media supported by the EU so that they include relevant material, measures and platforms allowing people with disabilities to access information. Disaggregation by type of medium may include online and traditional media. Each medium supported is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
|
Number of state and non-state actors supported by the EU for the integration of assistive technologies in their systems, disaggregated by type of actor, including schools and other public and private entities
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of state and non-state actors supported by the EU so that they integrated assistive technologies (such as braille) in their systems and services. Disaggregation by type of actor includes a. state (e.g. ministries, police authorities, prisons) or b. non-state (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Each actor is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 13. Strengthened capacities for the prevention of the closing of civic space and for countering violations of freedom of assembly and association |
Number of people reached by civil society campaigns supported by the EU to counter shrinking of civic space, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of people reached via CSOs' campaigns. Information to be provided upon based also on the type of medium used for the public awareness campaign (reach via traditional media, social media, participants in physical or digital events). The reach of online media, radio and TV inevitably includes the risk of double-counting people who have been reached by various campaigns of the same EU intervention. In cases where physical presence is reported / counted, each person should be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participated / attended various campaign events. |
Number of CSO and platforms working on freedom of assemby and association, supported by the EU
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of Civil society organisations, as well as the number of CSO platforms that are supported by the EU in their efforts and work on freedom of assembly and freedom of association. Each organisation is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 14. Strengthened capacities for the promotion of freedom of expression, media freedom and pluralism online, combatting hate speech, extremism and disinformation |
Number of people reached through civil society campaigns/events on access to information, freedom of expression, hate speech, extremism and disinformation in the used of media thanks to support of the EU intervention, disaggregated by sex, age and topic covered during training
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the overall coverage of population in terms of their participation in different types of awareness raising activities supported by the intervention. These can include: 1. community dialogues, 2. radio programmes, 3. multimedia campaigns, 4. roundtables on specific topics, 5. workshops and 6. online and in-person trainings), disaggregated by sex and age group.
For more indicators related to Democracy, please visit the relevant Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/democracy
|
Number of people reached through Civil Society-led advocacy strategies and campaigns funded by the EU to raise awareness on unlawful restrictions on fundamental freedoms (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU interventions monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of people whose knowledge on combatting hate speech, extremism and disinformation has been increased with EU support, disaggregated by sex and type of actor represented (state, non-state, CSOs, media etc.)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
The results of the indicator derive from surveys and evaluations made prior to an intervention's training, following the training but also wherever possible and at the end of the intervention's lifetime. The purpose of the indicator is to show not only the result directly after a training or awareness raising session, but also the long lasting actual use of knowledge, methods and tools learnt during the session. Each person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even they participated in different sessions.
For more indicators related to Democracy, please visit the relevant Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/democracy
|
|
Number of national and local media landscape assessments conducted with EU support
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
The indicator refers to mapping exercises conducted on the existence and type of local and national media outlets. The information collected on this indicator can also provide information on the plurality of the media landscape in a given country or region within a country.Â
For more indicators related to Democracy, please visit the relevant Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/democracy
|
|
Number of illegal contents inciting hatred, violence and terrorism online detected and removed by online platforms with EU support
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of articles or online media publications with illegal content, especially in relation to terrorism and illegal hate speech that were detected with support from the intervention and effectively removed by the concerned online platforms.Â
For more indicators related to Democracy, please visit the relevant Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/democracy
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 15. Enhanced awareness and advocacy capacities for the promotion of cultural rights, cultural heritage and cultural diversity |
Number of organisations supported by the EU which target minorities, the indigenous persons, youth, and women, for the transmission of cultural heritage traditional knowledge, languages and/or practices
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number organisations that are supported by the EU in their efforts to approach and target groups with traditional knowledge and cultural heritage, so that this knowledge is safeguarded and passed on to further generations. Organisations may include local associations, local groups, CSOs etc. Every organisation is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention.
|
Number of people reached with awareness and / or advocacy material created with EU support for the documentation or valorisation of peoples’ cultural rights, cultural heritage and diversity, disaggregated by type of content created and its nature (tangible, intangible)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of people reached with awareness raising material (publications, reports, public events/performances, digital database etc.) developed with EU support, regarding or showcasing peoples’ cultural rights (e.g. artistic freedom) cultural heritage and diversity. Disaggregated by a. type of content created (audio, visual, written, printed, online, offline), b. type of topic covered (tangible, intangible).
|
|
Number of state and non-state actors (persons) trained by the EU-funded intervention, with increased knowledge/skills on the use of contemporary methods for the promotion of cultural rights, access to culture, cultural heritage and / or cultural diversity, disaggregated by type of actors
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
The results of the indicator derive from surveys and evaluations made prior to an intervention's training, following the training but also wherever possible and at the end of the intervention's lifetime. The purpose of the indicator is to show not only the result directly after a training session, but also the long lasting actual use of knowledge, methods and tools learnt during the training session.
Disaggregation by type of actor includes a. state (e.g. ministries, local governments, municipalities) or b. non-state (e.g. CSOs, local communities, local organisations). Every actor is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participated in different training sessions.
The training provided with EU support may focus on awareness regarding legal frameworks and procedures, tools for awareness raising, advocacy tools and methods etc.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 16. Strengthened regulatory capacities and measures addressing access to social services, quality and affordable health services and education |
GERF 2.31 - Number of countries which have benefitted from EU support to strengthen their social protection systems (OPSYS core indicator)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems - Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention, ROM reviews, EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports
Additional Information:
For more information about the EU RF methodological notes please see https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/eu-rfi |
Extent to which the EU-funded intervention supported the design/revision of the system for the provision of quality and affordable health services
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator which measures the extent to which the EU-funded intervention contributed to the design/revision of the system for the provision of quality and affordable health services. The combination of comparative data and information from national and international reports, as well as designed baseline and endline surveys (with qualitative and/or quantitative data) conducted by the EU interventions can provide the results for this indicator.
|
|
Extent to which the EU-funded intervention contributed to the design/revision of the system for the provision of quality and affordable education
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator which measures the extent to which the EU-funded intervention contributed to the design/revision of the system for the provision of quality and affordable educations. The combination of comparative data and information from national and international reports, as well as designed baseline and endline surveys (with qualitative and/or quantitative data) conducted by the EU interventions can provide the results for this indicator.
For more indicators around the topic of Education, please visit the relevant Results Chain and Indicators at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators/education
|
|
Number of public officials trained by the EU-funded intervention, who increased knowledge and/or skills in contemporary methods for the provision of social services, health services and education, disaggregated by type of actor
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
Â
Disaggregation by type of actor represented includes, for example, ministries, state companies, regulatory authorities, etc. Every person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participated in different training sessions.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 17. Strengthened capacities for the protection of labour rights and promotion of decent work |
GERF 2.14/ EURF 2.15 - Number of people who have benefited from institution or workplace based VET/skills development interventions supported by the EU, disaggregated for digital skills (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF - Vocational Education and Training (VET) refers to ‘learning pathways which aim to equip people with knowledge, know-how, skills and/or competences required in particular occupations or more broadly in the labour market’. Skills development interventions are those that actively increase access to employment opportunities of the unemployed, inactive or individuals aiming to improve their employment status, e.g. to assist eligible individuals obtain the skills they need for employment and cope with labour market requests. Sex-disaggregation is relevant. For more detail, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.15_-_vet_skills_development_180808.pdf |
Number of persons living in a forced labour situation who are supported by the EU, disaggregated by age and sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EU-funded support can include, for example, legal aid, assistance through Human Rights Defenders, etc. ILO C-130 defines forced labour as "all work or service which is exacted from any person under the threat of a penalty and for which the person has not offered himself or herself voluntarily." This can refer to, inter alia, abuse of vulnerability, deception, restriction of movement, isolation, physical and sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working and living conditions, excessive overtime, etc. ILO C-105 specifically prohibits the use of forced labour by states authorities to curtail freedom of expression and of association, to encourage discrimination of all kind, to pursue economic objectives or as means of labour discipline. It is important to underline that forced labour also includes trafficking – defined as “recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons for the purpose of exploitation”, as well as slavery – defined as forms of “forced labour, debt bondage, serfdom, children working in slavery or slavery-like conditions, domestic servitude, sexual slavery, and servile forms of marriage”. |
|
Number of people reached with EU support to increase their awareness about labour rights, disaggregated by sex, age, disability status
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
The results of the indicators derive based on surveys and evaluations made prior to an intervention's training, following the training but also wherever possible and at the end of the intervention's lifetime. The purpose of the indicator is to show not only the result directly after a training session, but also the long lasting actual use of knowledge, methods and tools learnt during the training session. Every person is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if they participated in various training sessions or capacity building initiatives.
|
|
Number of people reached through Civil Society-led advocacy strategies and campaigns funded by the EU to raise awareness on responsible business conduct (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 18. Strengthened human rights networks and opportunities for partnerships created among state actors, international and regional organisations, NHRIs and CSOs |
GAP III - Number of joint activities and programmes on human rights, and gender equality and women’s empowerment with partners inter alia UN, AU, NATO, CoE, OSCE, G7, G20 and ASEAN (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
GAP III - This indicator measures the cooperation and synergies between initiatives of EU funded interventions and those of other partners. This indicator is part of the EU Gender Action Plan III available at: https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_284_en_final.pdf |
Number of Human Rights institutions supported by EU for the creation of networks and partnerships with other national, regional or international human rights organisations
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of Human Rights institutions that are supported by the EU in their efforts to create networks and partnerships with other Human Rights organisations or institutions at a national, regional or international level. Each institution supported is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if it is supported in its networking with various other organisations.
|
|
Number of workshops and conferences organised with EU support between inter-governmental mechanisms and National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of networking and know-how exchange initiatives that occur via workshops and conferences with the support of the EU between National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) and inter-governmental organisations. EU-funded nterventions are encouraged to map the organisations and NHRIs represented.
|
|
Number of universities supported by the EU which promote human rights education
(Numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of higher education institutions, namely universities that are supported by the EU in their efforts to promote human rights education via their programmes and curricula. Each university supported is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even in cases where it has developed various human-rights programmes (e.g. undergraduate, post-graduate, PhD, etc.).
|
|
Number of non-university organisations supported by the EU to collaborate with universities in Human Rights education events such as: lecturing, hosting internships, site visits, joint research, broken down by type of organisation and collaboration
(Numeric)
Data Source:
CIVICUS Monitor - Tracking Civic Space https://monitor.civicus.org/
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 19. Enhanced capacities of State actors for developing, evaluating and implementing regulatory frameworks for digital environments and Artificial Intelligence that respect human rights |
GERF 2.10 - Number of countries supported by the EU to (a) develop and/or revise, b) implement policies/strategies/laws/regulations (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
Definition from the methodological note of EURF indicator when available. |
Number of inclusive dialogues and consultations on the regulation and use of new technologies with government’s authorities in partner countries, promoted and facilitated by EU-funded actions
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Universal Human Rights Index Database - Universal Periodic Review https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/UPRMain.aspx
EU Interventions monitoring system - progress reports with reference to the theme specific intervention and possible recommendations
Additional Information:
Interventions should opt one of the two EURF indicators, namely "Number of countries supported by the EU to a) develop and/or revise, b) implement digital-related policies / strategies / laws / regulations" and "Number of inclusive dialogues and consultations on the regulation and use of new technologies with government’s authorities in partner countries, promoted and facilitated by EU-funded actions." in order to avoid double counting of results.
|
|
GERF 2.12 - Number of a) countries supported by the EU to enhance … b) people supported by the EU with enhanced … access to digital government services (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
Definition from methodological note of EURF indicator when available. Sex-disaggregation is applicable for the number of people. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: 20. Increased capacities for the unrestricted access and use of new technologies by all |
GERF 2.11 - Number of people with access to Internet with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
Definition from methodological note of EURF indicator when available. Sex-disaggregation is applicable for the number of people. |
Number of NGOs supported by the EU-funded intervention in the detection and oversight of compliance of online activities and policies with human rights and democratic standards (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations, ROM reviews, and evaluations
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of NGOs that are supported by the EU in their efforts to detect and have oversight of the compliance of online activities with human rights standards, fundamental rights and democratic values and standards. Support to these NGOs may include, but is not limited to, capacity building via training and workshops, but also to support in operating software or other systems that allow for such a detection and oversight. Each organisation is to be counted once in the lifetime of an EU-funded intervention, even if it participates in various capacity building efforts. |
|
Number of digital tools developed with EU support for the protection and promotion of human rights, disaggregated by type of actor
(Numeric)
Data Source:
UN Human Rights Statements and Special Rapporteurs Statements, Regional organisations' official databases, National Databases, Ministries' Statements, Press Releases.
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of digital tools (online and offline) that are developed with EU support for the protection and promotion of human rights. These may include monitoring applications or digital systems, state adopted digital programmes for the monitoring, mapping and flagging of human rights violations etc.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Impact: To achieve the full realisation of all human rights for all |
Country score according to the Mo Ibrahim Foundation Index, especially the component on participation and human rights, which covers freedom of expression, association/ assembly, civil liberties, human rights violations and gender equality
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
The Mo Ibrahim Foundation Index of African Governance includes assessment on areas such as: -Extent to which citizens and organisations can express opinions freely; the degree of print, broadcast and internet freedom; and the existence of media and citizen self-censorship -Extent to which citizens can associate freely in public and participate in civic and political organisations, and workers can organise into trade unions -Extent to which citizens enjoy civil liberties and can seek redress for violations of these rights -Ratification of the nine core international human rights conventions, and two optional protocols on children, and the submission of reports to the relevant bodies -Likelihood of a state being accused of serious human rights violations -Extent to which the government promotes equal access for men and women to human capital development opportunities and productive and economic resources, and provides equal status and protection under the law -Existence of women's legal protection from rape, assault and sexual harassment. NB: The Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) only covers African partner countries. For more information about the Index design, please see http://mo.ibrahim.foundation/iiag/
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: C. Improved equality, inclusion, respect and engagement of people in all their diversity in all spheres of public and private life |
Number of persons removed from a forced labour situation following EU support, disaggregated by age and sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: (i) interim and final reports from implementing organisations, (ii) ROM reviews and (iii) evaluations
Additional Information:
EU-funded support can include, for example, legal aid, assistance through Human Rights Defenders, etc. ILO C-29 defines forced labour as "all work or service which is exacted from any person under the threat of a penalty and for which the person has not offered himself or herself voluntarily." This can refer to, inter alia, abuse of vulnerability, deception, restriction of movement, isolation, physical and sexual violence, intimidation and threats, retention of identity documents, withholding of wages, debt bondage, abusive working and living conditions, excessive overtime, etc. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: D. Improved effectiveness of the actions of Human Rights Defenders, including independent NHRIs, and CSOs operating in safe space for the promotion and protection of human rights |
Extent to which HRDs are publicly recognised by state and state officials
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Human Rights Defender Index (Justice & Peace). Proposed measurement scale: ordinal, based on country expert assessment (SOV):
0) No recognition of the work of human rights defenders at all. Their work is often undermined and disregarded.
1) The state does not undermine and disregard the work of HRD; however, it does not publicly recognize their work either.
2) The work of human rights defenders is encouraged and recognized by the state but only in regards to human rights that do not present a threat to the public moral of the state, the government or its religious affiliation (e.g. the state does not support HRD work on LGBT rights, abortion and similar).
3) HRD and their work is publicly encouraged and endorsed by the State and its officials. HRD receive prizes for their work.
Â
|
Extent to which the need for protection for HRDs at risk is recognised and addressed by national authorities
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This is a qualitative indicator which measures the extent to which the need for protection for HRDs at risk is recognised and addressed by state authorities. The combination of  data and information from national and international reports, as well as designed baseline and endline surveys (with qualitative and/or quantitative data) conducted by the EU interventions can provide the results for this indicator.Â
|