Results and Indicators
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Impact: Make cities and human settlements safe, inclusive, resilient and sustainable |
GERF 1.23/ SDG 1.1.1 - Proportion of the population living below the international poverty line y, disaggregated by sex, age (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National statistics - if data is not available for target cities, baseline and endline surveys will need to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 1.1.1 (adapted for city level). The indicator “proportion of the population below the international poverty line” is defined as the percentage of the population living on less than $1.90 a day at 2011 international prices. The 'international poverty line' is currently set at $1.90 a day at 2011 international prices. If available, disaggregate data by employment status. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-01-01a.pdf |
GDP per capita for the target city
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
GINI index for the target city
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
World Bank, GINI index provides a summary measure of the degree of inequality and may be calculated using either income or consumption data. It measures the extent to which the distribution of income or consumption among individuals or households within an economy deviates from a perfectly equal distribution. The Gini index is the Gini coefficient expressed as a percentage - ranging from 0 which represents perfect equality to 100 which implies perfect inequality. The national statistical data can be used to calculate the index for target city. For more details, please see: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI.
|
|
Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (e.g. PM2.5 and PM10) in the target city (population weighted)
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG 11.6.2 (adapted for city level). The mean annual concentration of fine suspended particles of less than 2.5 microns in diameters (PM2.5) is a common measure of air pollution. The mean is a population-weighted average for urban population in a country, and is expressed in micrograms per cubic meter. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-11-06-02.pdf.
|
|
Number of deaths, missing persons and directly affected persons attributed to disasters in the target city, per 100,000 population
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 11.5.1 (adapted for city level). This indicator measures the number of people who died, went missing or were directly affected by disasters per 100,000 population. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-11-05-01.pdf.
|
|
Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution in the target city, disaggregated by sex and age
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 3.9.1 (adapted for city level). The mortality attributable to the joint effects of household and ambient air pollution can be expressed as: Number of deaths, Death rate. Death rates are calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the total population (or indicated if a different population group is used, e.g. children under 5 years). For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-03-09-01.pdf
|
|
SDG 5.2.1. (GAP III) Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls aged 15 years and older subjected to physical, sexual or psychological violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by form of violence and by age
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 5.2.1 - please check data availability before using this Tier II indicator. Due to constraints related to feasibility (as noted in the Feasibility section below), this indicator currently globally reports only on the percentage of ever-partnered women and girls aged 15 to 49 who have experienced physical and/or sexual partner violence. For more detail, please see https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-02-01.pdf.
|
|
SDG 5.2.2. (GAP III) Proportion of women and girls aged 15 years and older subjected to sexual violence by persons other than an intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age and place of occurrence
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 5.2.2 - please check data availability before using this Tier II indicator. If data is not available for the city of interest, please ensure that baseline and endline studies will be conducted by the EU-funded intervention. Sexual violence is defined as any sort of harmful or unwanted sexual behaviour that is imposed on someone. For more detail, please see https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-02-02.pdf.
|
|
Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene (exposure to unsafe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for All (WASH) services) in the target city, disaggregated by sex and age (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 3.9.2 and GAP III (adapted for city level). The mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene (exposure to unsafe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for All (WASH) services) as defined as the number of deaths from unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene (exposure to unsafe WASH services) in a year, divided by the population, and multiplied by 100,000. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-03-09-02.pdf |
|
Death rate due to road traffic injuries in the target city, disaggregated by sex and age
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 3.6.1 (adapted for city level). Death rate due to road traffic injuries as defined as the number of road traffic fatal injury deaths per 100,000 population. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-03-06-01.pdf
|
|
Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population in the target city, by sex and age of the victim (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 16.1.1 (adapted for city level). The indicator is defined as the total count of victims of intentional homicide divided by the total population, expressed per 100,000 population. Intentional homicide is defined as the unlawful death inflicted upon a person with the intent to cause death or serious injury; population, after adaptation, refers to total resident population in a given city in a given year. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=16&Target=16.1 |
|
Proportion of urban population living in slums, informal settlements or inadequate housing in the target city (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 11.1.1. (adapted for city level). For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-11-01-01.pdf. |
|
Proportion of total adult population in the target city with secure tenure rights to land, with legally recognized documentation in target city, disaggregated by sex
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG Indicator 1.4.2 (adapted for city level). Legally recognized documentation: Legal documentation of rights refers to the recording and publication of information on the nature and location of land, rights and right holders in a form that is recognized by government, and is therefore official. Please specify the documentation relevant for the national context. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-04-02.pdf.
|
|
Proportion of total adult population in the target city who perceive their rights to land as secure, disaggregated by sex
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG Indicator 1.4.2 (adapted for city level). Perceived security of tenure: Perception of tenure security refers to an individual’s perception of the likelihood of involuntary loss of land, such as disagreement of the ownership rights over land or ability to use it, regardless of the formal status and can be more optimistic or pessimistic. Although those without land rights’ documentation may frequently be perceived to be under threat, and those with documentation perceived as protected, there may be situations where documented land rights alone are insufficient to guarantee tenure security. Conversely, even without legally recognized documentation, individuals may feel themselves to be protected against eviction or dispossession. Therefore, capturing and analyzing these diverse ranges of situations will enable a more comprehensive understanding of land tenure security, based on a local specific context. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-01-04-02.pdf
|
|
Unemployment rate in the target city, disaggregated by sex, age and disability status (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National statistics - if not available for target city, baseline and endline surveys will have to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 8.5.2 (adapted for city level). The unemployment rate conveys the percentage of persons in the labour force who are unemployed. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-08-05-02.pdf |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Improved environmental management and climate mitigation by targeted cities |
Area of target city comprised of natural or semi-natural areas
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Square meters of public green space available.
|
Proportion of residents in the target city living within 300m of a park or accessible natural/semi-natural area
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of cities that adopted a climate change strategy whose development was supported by the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
|
Proportion of municipal solid waste collected and managed in controlled facilities out of total municipal waste generated in the target city
(Percentage)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
SDG Indicator 11.6.1 (adapted to city level): Proportion of municipal solid waste collected and managed in controlled facilities out of total municipal solid waste generated by cities. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-11-06-01.pdf
|
|
GERF2.7/ EURF 2.21 - Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions avoided (tonnes CO2eq) with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
The preferred data source of the net change in GHG emissions per year is the intervention feasibility or appraisal report. Estimates are expected to be available at the design stage of the intervention. Whether indirect emissions are included will vary by interventions.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.21. This indicator measures the net change in the GHG emissions relative to the assumed "business as usual" or baseline scenario for typical year of operation as, in tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tonnes CO2 eq) primarily focused on interventions in the energy sector. Where easily available, net change in GHG emissions should also be reported for the other sectors. |
|
EFSD 6.1. (energy/connectivity/water) Tonnes of oil equivalent fossil fuels avoided per year by renewable energy/energy efficiency intervention funded by EU investments (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 6.1. (energy/connectivity/water) Consumption of fossil fuels avoided, measured as tonnes of oil equivalent (toe), as a result of a renewable electricity generation or energy-saving project funded by the investment |
|
EFSD 3.1. (energy/connectivity/water) Number of people provided with access to clean cooking systems and fuel (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Database of project beneficiaries
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 3.1. (energy/connectivity/water) Additional number of people using at least tier 3 solid biomass improved cooking stoves or biogas cookers or LPG/Ethanol cookers or cookers using renewable sources |
|
EFSD 3.2. (energy/connectivity/water) Energy savings as a result of energy efficiency measures at the annual level (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 3.2. (energy/connectivity/water) Energy saved by the direct actions of the project, as compared to the energy that would have been consumed under a “business as usual” scenario. |
|
EFSD 2.2. (energy/connectivity/water) Additional electricity production from renewable sources, per year, disaggregated by urban and rural (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 2.2. (energy/connectivity/water) Total net annual average electricity energy generated by project from renewable sources independently from maximum capacity. |
|
Average daily consumption of water per capita in target city
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Total water consumption per capita per day in targeted city.Â
|
|
Proportion of volume of water billed in relation to volume of water produced in target city on annual level
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Percentage of water loss of the total water consumption. One of the calculation methods is to compare volume of water billed for payment and water produced at an annual level.Â
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Strenghtened urban resilience to natural and manmade disasters |
SDG 11.b.2 - Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database. Text of strategies and policy documents
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 11.b.2. Increasing the proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies, which the Sendai Framework calls for, will contribute to sustainable development and strengthen economic, social, health and environmental resilience. Their economic, environmental and social perspectives would include poverty eradication, urban resilience, and climate change adaptation. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-11-0b-02.pdf. |
Number of cities that adopted a disaster risk reduction strategy whose development was supported by the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Database of training participants, pre and post-training tests
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Effective implementation and public funding of investment plans in urban areas |
Proportion of taxes collected in relation to planned tax collection in target city on annual level
(Percentage)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
|
Number of infrastructure investments realized through Public Private Partnerships
(numeric)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems (Progress and final reports for the EU-funded intervention; EU-funded feasibility or appraisal reports ; Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention )
Additional Information:
|
|
Value of infrastructure investments realized through Public Private Partnerships
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Database of training participants, pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information:
|
|
Proportion of capital investment budget in relation to total city budget on annual level (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
|
|
Proportion of capital investment budget executed annually in relation to the total planned capital investment budget in the target city
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent of implementation of the capital investment plan for the target city (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Improved national and city-level policy framework for integrated urban development |
Status of adoption of the national urban policy by the government
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
Extent of implementation of the national urban policy by the government
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Database of training participants, pre and post-training tests
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which female and male city representatives participate in development of the national urban policy
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
This qualitative indicator can be used to assess the extent to which mechanisms and channels exist for participation of female and male city representatives in development of the national urban policy.
|
|
GAP III - Number of laws and policies where recommendations made by women’s rights organisations have been taken on board by regional, national and local government bodies during the drafting or revision process, including in conflict-affected contexts
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
This indicator is included in the EU's Gender Action Plan (GAP III), available at https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/swd_2020_2…;
|
|
Status of adoption of urban development plans in target city (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Text of strategies and policy documents
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which city urban development plans adhere to principles of integrated urban development
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Database of training participants, pre and post-training tests
Additional Information:
The following are the key focus areas that fall within the integrated urban planning dimension: 1.1 Vision and long-term strategic planning; 1.2 Stakeholder participation; 1.3 Data management; 1.4 Trend analyses; 1.5 Land use and zoning; 1.6 Urban growth patterns; 1.7 Informal settlements; 1.8 Transport and mobility integrated with land use; and 1.9 Cultural heritage. For more details, please see: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/339851517836894370/pdf/12314….
Â
|
|
Extent to which civil society and other partners participate in planning and monitoring the implementation of urban policies (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
The methodology developed by OECD-UNDP Joint Support Team for Global Partnership Monitoring can be utilized as guidance for measuring CSO effectiveness and enabling environment. The relevant methodology is provided under indicator 2: Civil Society Organisations operate within an environment that maximises their engagement in and contribution to development. For more details, please see: https://www.effectivecooperation.org/system/files/2020-10/Indicator2_Self-Reflection%20Guide.pdf |
|
Level of horizontal coordination on policy framework for integrated urban development
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Please define stakeholders relevant for horizontal policy coordination.Â
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Enhanced delivery of accessible municipal services including water, sanitation and waste management, energy, transportation, education and health |
GERF 1.30/ SDG 6.1.1. (GAP III) Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 6.1.1, also in the European Union's Gender Action Plan (GAP III). Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services is currently being measured by the proportion of population using an improved basic drinking water source which is located on premises, available when needed and free of faecal (and priority chemical) contamination. ‘Improved’ drinking water sources include: piped water into dwelling, yard or plot; public taps or standpipes; boreholes or tubewells; protected dug wells; protected springs; packaged water; delivered water and rainwater. For more information, please see https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-06-01-01.pdf. |
GERF 1.31/ SDG 6.2.1 (GAP III) Proportion of population using (a) safely managed sanitation services and (b) a hand-washing facility with soap and water (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database
Additional Information:
|
|
GERF 2.3 Number of people with access to electricity with EU support through: (a) new access, (b) improved access (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU interventions monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews, evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF 2.9, under (a) new access: This indicator measures number of individuals with a) new access and to on-grid, mini/micro grids or stand-alone electricity systems. Where possible, disaggregate by source of access (e.g. on/off grid, mini/micro grid). For more details please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.9_-_access_to_electricity_180808.pdf. |
|
SDG 11.2.1. Proportion of population that has convenient access to public transport, by sex, age and disability status (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
SDG indicator 11.2.1 - please check data availability before using this Tier II indicator. If data is not available for the city of interest, please ensure that baseline and endline studies will be conducted by the EU-funded intervention. Access to public transport is considered convenient when a stop is accessible within a walking distance along the street network of 500 m from a reference point such as a home, school, work place, market, etc. to a low-capacity public transport system (e.g. bus, Bus Rapid Transit) and/or 1 km to a high-capacity system (e.g. rail, metro, ferry). Additional criteria for defining public transport that is convenient include: a. Public transport accessible to all special-needs customers, including those who are physically, visually, and/or hearing-impaired, as well as those with temporary disabilities, the elderly, children and other people in vulnerable situations. b. Public transport with frequent service during peak travel times c. Stops present a safe and comfortable station environment. For more information, please see https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-11-02-01.pdf. |
|
GERF 2.34/ EURF 2.6 - Number of women of reproductive age using modern contraception methods with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU interventions monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews, evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.6, also in GAP III. Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) currently using, or whose sexual partner is using a modern contraceptive method with EU support. For analytical purposes, contraceptive methods are often classified as either modern or traditional. Modern methods of contraception include female and male sterilization, oral hormonal pills, intrauterine devices (IUD), male condoms, injectables, implants (including Norplant), vaginal barrier methods, female condoms and emergency contraception. Traditional methods of contraception include the rhythm (periodic abstinence), withdrawal, lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) and folk methods. Traditional methods are not counted under this indicator. For more detail, please see https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.6_-_women_of_reproductive_age_using_modern_contraception_180807.pdf. |
|
Percentage of population living within 5 km of a health facility (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures the number of people living within 5 km of a health facility (health post, rural health centre, clinic, general or specialised hospital) as a percentage of the total number of people in a defined geographical area |
|
Primary education net enrolment rate in the target city, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National Education Ministry (EMIS), UIS
Additional Information:
The net enrolment rate counts the total number of enrolled children who are of the official school age group for an education level, as a percentage of the total population of the official school age group for that level. |
|
Secondary education net enrolment rate in the target city, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
National Education Ministry (EMIS), UIS
Additional Information:
|
|
Percentage of wastewater receiving primary treatment
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Improved access to decent and affordable housing |
Number of people living in social housing provided by city authorities
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
EFSD 1.14. Number of people benefitting from improved housing conditions in urban areas, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.14. Number of people benefitting from improved housing conditions in urban areas. |
|
New and refurbished habitable housing floor area in the target city
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Total area of new and refurbished social housing in the target city. At outcome level, this indicator is not limited only to area built or refurbished with EU support, but aims to record the broader progress in the target city.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Sustainable decent jobs created with EU support |
Proportion of informal employment in total employment in the target city, disaggregated by sex and sector
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
SDG Indicator: 8.3.1 (adapted for city level). This indicator presents the share of employment which is classified as informal employment in the total economy, and separately in agriculture and in non-agriculture. For more details, please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-08-03-01.pdf
|
GERF 2.13a /EURF 2.11 - Number of (a) jobs, (b) green jobs supported/sustained by the EU (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. from governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.11. The number of full time equivalent jobs supported or sustained by the intervention should be included for this indicator. This indicator currently only covers direct jobs, which are those directly supported by the EU interventions, or those provided within enterprises that are reached by EU support during the reporting period. This indicator may include seasonal and part time direct jobs supported, and may include formal and informal posts. Part time or seasonal jobs should be converted to full time equivalent (FTE) on a pro rata basis (e.g. full time posts for three months would be equivalent to a 0.25 FTE job for a single year reporting period). Full time equivalent should be based on the local definition/legislation. If no information regarding working hours is available, as a last resort, you may use the rough estimate that two part-time or seasonal jobs equal one FTE over the reporting period. Temporarily vacant posts may be included in this indicator as long as there is intention to fill the jobs in the near future. Unpaid jobs, especially those designated to family workers, should not be included for this indicator. Indirect and induced jobs supported are outside the scope of this indicator. Where possible, please disaggregate by formal/informal. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.11-_number_of_direct_jobs_supported_or_sustained_181123.pdf |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Specific Objective - Outcome: Effective measures for urban safety implemented |
Average time from a request for the intervention of security forces until the intervention begins, disaggregated by population group
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
Percentage of citizens/respondents who trust the city security forces, disaggregated by sex, age, population group, migration status
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
|
Proportion of complaints filed with authorities and alleging violence, abuse and exploitation of persons with disabilities that have been investigated and adjudicated
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
For similar indicators on this topic, please see the  the SDG-Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Resource Package developed by the OHCHR, available at https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/SDG-CRPD-Resource/Ind….
|
|
Percentage of referred cases of gender-based and sexual violence against women and children that are investigated and sentenced
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
|
Percentage of citizens who are [very/fairly] satisfied with the safety in target city, disaggregated by sex, age, population group, migration status (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which measures for urban safety designed with EU support, have been adopted and implemented by the city government (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please specify measures developed by the EU-funded intervention. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities of cities to design and implement urban climate change strategies mitigation and adaptation |
GERF2.5/ EURF 2.19 - Number of countries and cities with climate change and/or disaster risk reduction strategies (a) developed or (b) under implementation with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.19, under (a). This indicator refers to the total number of countries and/or cities supported by the EU in their development of strategies in the field of climate change and/or disaster risk reduction (DRR). Only strategies endorsed by the government are counted. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.19_-_climate_change_ddr_strategies_180808.pdf. |
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded interventions with increased knowledge of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacity and facilities for a more efficient and sustainable use of energy in cities |
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to energy consumption efficiency of the target city systems (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator measures extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to efficiency of energy consumption. |
EFSD 1.1. (energy/connectivity/water) Length of transmission lines constructed or upgraded with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.1. (energy/connectivity/water) The total linear kilometres of new, reconstructed, rehabilitated, or upgraded transmission lines. Follow the local definition of 'power transmission line'. Where local definitions do not exist, any line with a voltage equal or higher than 33 KV can be considered transmission. |
|
EFSD 1.2. (energy/connectivity/water) Length of distribution lines constructed or upgraded with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.2. (energy/connectivity/water) The total linear kilometres of new, reconstructed, rehabilitated, or upgraded distribution lines. Follow the local definition of power distribution line. Where local definitions do not exist, any line with a voltage below 33 KV can be considered distribution. |
|
GERF 2.4/ EURF 2.10 - Renewable energy generation capacity installed with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
The preferred data source for Renewable energy generation capacity installed (MW) is the intervention feasibility or appraisal reports. Estimates or targets are expected to be available at the design stage of the intervention.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.10. Renewable energy generation capacity (hydro, solar, wind, geothermal, organic waste, sustainable biomass) expressed in MW installed with EU support. The installed capacity could be new or rehabilitated. In the case of rehabilitation only the additional installed capacity in comparison with the current available one should be reported for this indicator. This indicator should be disaggregated by on grid/ off-grid energy generation where possible. |
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in energy efficiency and sustainability, disaggregated by sex
(numeric)
Data Source:
Database of training participants, pre and post-training survey
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Increased provision of green areas |
Area of urban green provided or restored in target city with support of the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
|
Level of participation of citizens and public sector in initiatives for provision of green areas supported by the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities and facilities for urban waste management |
EFSD 1.12. Installed capacity for solid waste collection and disposal, per year (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.12. The indicator includes any capacity installed, including sorting, recycling, mechanical/biological/chemical/thermal treatment and landfill disposal. |
Amount of urban waste collected in target city annually with support of the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Project’s database of training participants, pre and post-training tests
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in urban waste management, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Project’s database of training participants, pre and post-training tests
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
|
Number of people benefiting from waste management systems designed/upgraded by the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities and facilities for the application of smart city solutions |
Number of people with access to e-governance systems and services established and/or improved with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
The number of people benefitting from EU supported digital services such as digitalising and interconnecting registries, eID, eProcurement, eHealth and other digitalised public services intended to increase the performance and the accountability of public services towards citizens and business. Please specify the service/system the EU-funded intervention is supporting. The exact beneficiaries will depend on the context of the EU-funded intervention. |
Number of policy documents or sector strategies developed/improved by making use of machine-readable data with support of the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Progress reports
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in smart city solutions, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
OECD Stats, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=CITIES
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
|
Number of e-governance systems and services established and/or improved with support of the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents. Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
The e-governance systems and services are digital services intended to increase the performance of public services towards citizens and business and can generate a social and/or a climate-friendly impact. Please specify the service/system the EU-funded intervention is supporting. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Cities better connected to surrounding rural areas |
Number of smallholders accessing city markets with the support of the EU-funded intervention, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries/participants
Additional Information:
|
Number of measures implemented for better urban-rural linkages with the support of the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to connecting the city with rural areas
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
National statistics - if data is not available for target cities, baseline and endline surveys will need to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please specify how EU-funded intervention contributes to the connection and how this contribution is measured.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Increased facilities, service and planning for business development |
Number of urban logistic infrastructure facilities supported by the EU funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please specify the type of business development facilities (i.e. market places, incubators, ports, or other). |
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in business development, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
National statistics - if data is not available for target cities, baseline and endline surveys will need to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
|
GERF 2.17/EURF 2.13 - Number of beneficiaries with access to financial services with EU support: (a) firms, (b) people (all financial services), (c) people (digital financial services) (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF and GAP III indicator. For more detail, please see https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.13_-_access_to_financial_services_180808.pdf. |
|
EFSD 5.1. (MSME financing) Number of cooperatives and/or social enterprises supported (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries
Additional Information:
This indicator focuses on monitoring innovative and more inclusive business models that can be scaled up, such as social enterprises and cooperatives. |
|
Number of business development knowledge products and tools developed with support of the EU-funded intervention (OPSYs core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Enhanced financing capacities of cities i e . improving collection of local taxes, procurement, etc |
Extent to which the EU-funded intervention contributed to efficiency of administrative systems through utilization of ICT tools
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data - if data is not available for target cities, baseline and endline surveys will need to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please define how efficiency is measured and specify the administrative systems. The efficiency pre and post EU-funded intervention will need to be studied.
|
Number of financial policies developed with the support of the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database.
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention when needed.
Additional Information:
Please specify policy areas (e.g. revenue mobilisation, public financial management, budget transparency)
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in public financial management and budgeting, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Database of training participants; pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible. |
|
GERF 2.19/ EURF 2.30 - Number of countries supported by the EU to strengthen revenue mobilisation, public financial management and/or budget transparency (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.30. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.30_-_countries_supported_to_strengthen_revenue_mobilisation_pfm_180803.pdf. |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities and facilities for sustainable urban mobility |
EURF 2.16 -Total length of road supported by the EU through (a) construction (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews and evaluations. Other sources of intervention information may also include: design studies, tender documents and specifications (for expected results), supervisor reports and reports from site visits.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.16. (under construction). The total length of road supported by the EU through construction (kms). For inclusion, roads should be part of the classified network of a country. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.16_-_total_length_of_road_180808.pdf |
EURF 2.16 - Total length of road supported by the EU through (b) rehabilitation (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews and evaluations. Other sources of intervention information may also include: design studies, tender documents and specifications (for expected results), supervisor reports and reports from site visits.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.16. (under rehabilitation). The total length of road supported by the EU through rehabilitation (kms). For inclusion, roads should be part of the classified network of a country. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.16_-_total_length_of_road_180808.pdf |
|
EURF 2.16- Total length of road supported by the EU through (c) maintenance (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc.), ROM reviews and evaluations. Other sources of intervention information may also include: design studies, tender documents and specifications (for expected results), supervisor reports and reports from site visits.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.16. (under maintenance). The total length of road supported by the EU through maintenance (kms). For inclusion, roads should be part of the classified network of a country. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.16_-_total_length_of_road_180808.pdf |
|
EFSD 1.1. Length of new or upgraded urban transport lanes (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.1. Total length of urban transport lanes, including bus lane, tramline, or metro tracks built or upgraded. Upgrading includes all activities to restore degraded transport lanes to its originally intended design capacity (repair or rehabilitation) and/or to improve on its design capacity (e.g. by widening bus lanes). Upgrading of road signage only does not count. |
|
EFSD 7.2 (energy/connectivity/water) Length of new or upgraded railways
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database.
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention when needed.
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 7.2. (energy/connectivity/water) Total length of railway tracks built or upgraded
|
|
EFSD 7.3 (energy/connectivity/water) Additional port terminal capacity (number of passengers), per year (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 7.3. (energy/connectivity/water) The indicator is the future capacity of the container terminal(s). In case of a terminal expansion, only include expansion capacity, although at the level of the project there should be information on the total capacity of the terminal(s), disaggregated by current terminal(s) capacity and expansion capacity. Depending on the type of terminal (passenger, container, or cargo), the units used will be different. |
|
EFSD 7.3 (energy/connectivity/water) Additional port terminal capacity (containers), per year (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 7.3. (energy/connectivity/water) The indicator is the future capacity of the container terminal(s). In case of a terminal expansion, only include expansion capacity, although at the level of the project there should be information on the total capacity of the terminal(s), disaggregated by current terminal(s) capacity and expansion capacity. Depending on the type of terminal (passenger, container, or cargo), the units used will be different. |
|
EFSD 7.3 (energy/connectivity/water) Additional port terminal capacity (cargo), per year (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 7.3. (energy/connectivity/water) The indicator is the future capacity of the container terminal(s). In case of a terminal expansion, only include expansion capacity, although at the level of the project there should be information on the total capacity of the terminal(s), disaggregated by current terminal(s) capacity and expansion capacity. Depending on the type of terminal (passenger, container, or cargo), the units used will be different. |
|
Total length of new or upgraded transport waterways infrastructure supported by the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Total length of waterway infrastructure. Upgrading includes all activities to restore degraded transport to its originally intended design capacity (repair or rehabilitation) and/or to improve on its design capacity.
|
|
Number of urban mobility studies supported by the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports published by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please define type of urban mobility studies developed and, if relevant, the key areas of coverage (e.g. sustainability, safety, equitability, accessibility for people with disabilities). |
|
Extent to which urban mobility facilities designed/built with EU support are accessible to people with disabilities
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
National level statistics
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
|
|
Number and proportion of engineers, urban planners, and transportation staff trained on trained in universal design and accessibility standards, in connection with mobility devices and the rights of users of mobility devices, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
For similar indicators on this topic, please see the the SDG-Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Resource Package developed by the OHCHR, available at https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/SDG-CRPD-Resource/Ind….
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in urban mobility and transport, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities and facilities for the provision of water and sanitation services |
EFSD 1.2. Length of new or rehabilitated water supply pipes in urban areas (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.2. Length of water mains and distribution pipes installed or upgraded in urban areas. All sizes of pipes intended to transport water for urban water use, expressed in their aggregate length in the network, irrespective of pipe diameter, comprising mains as well as reticulation pipes. |
EFSD 1.3. Length of new or rehabilitated sewer pipes in urban areas (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.3. Length of water mains and distribution pipes installed or upgraded in urban areas. All sizes of pipes intended to transport water for urban water use, expressed in their aggregate length in the network, irrespective of pipe diameter, comprising mains as well as reticulation pipes. |
|
EFSD 1.4. Number of new connections to water supply in urban areas (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.4. Number of new connections to the urban water network. Connections via standpipe can also be included. Only new connections resulting from the investment project are counted; those already connected to the network and receiving improved services through a project are not counted. |
|
EFSD 1.5. Daily volume of new and/or improved urban water treatment process capacity (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.5. Maximum amount of water that the new or improved urban treatment plant can process. Include additional capacity for drinking water. This indicator reflects the total new or additional capacity of treatment plant, independently of its production during operation. |
|
EFSD 1.6. Additional wastewater daily treatment capacity in urban areas (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.6. Additional amount of wastewater that the new or improved urban treatment plant can process. Improvements in both efficiency (e.g. increased capacity) or effectiveness (e.g. reduced water pollutants) can be included. For improvement gains only report on the capacity of treatment plant affected by the improvements. |
|
GERF 2.38/ EURF 2.8 - Number of people with access to improved drinking water source and/or sanitation facility with EU support, disaggregated by sex, location (rural/urban) (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.8 (water source), also EFSD indicator 8.2. The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation has proposed new drinking water and sanitation ‘ladders’ for the sustainable development goals (SDGs). These include different levels of service for water and sanitation. For the purpose of this indicator, following levels are included: safely managed/ basic / limited. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.8_-_access_to_watsan_180807.pdf. |
|
EURF 2.8 - under sanitation (EFSD 8.2) Number of people with access to an improved sanitation facility with EU support, disaggregated by sex, location (rural/urban) (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.8 (under sanitation), also EFSD indicator 8.2. The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation has proposed new drinking water and sanitation ‘ladders’ for the sustainable development goals (SDGs). These include different levels of service for water and sanitation. For the purpose of this indicator, following levels are included: safely managed/ basic / limited. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.8_-_access_to_watsan_180807.pdf. |
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in water and sanitation management, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities and facilities for decent and affordable housing provision |
Number of housing units built/refurbished by the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Adopted strategy document
Additional Information:
|
Status of development of feasibility studies on affordable housing supported by the EU-funded intervention
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in housing management, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
|
EFSD 1.15. Number of new and/or refurbished social and affordable housing units in urban areas (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Reports from the subcontractors, infrastructure/equipment handovers and inspection documents
Additional Information:
EFSD indicator 1.15. Square meters of new and/or refurbished social/affordable housing units in urban areas, including slums. Refurbishment includes all activities to restore a degraded habitation to its originally intended quality (meeting minimum local standards) and to improve its quality (to the level of minimum local standards or above). |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Strengthened system for land management and security of tenure in urban areas |
Number of women and men who received support of the EU-funded intervention to secure tenure of land, disaggregated by sex, age
(numeric)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Secure land tenure covers: formal titling, certificates or registration, customary tenure secured by an appropriate legal framework that ensures that customary rights cannot be negated and people cannot be arbitrarily dispossessed of their land. They can be secured by a variety of approaches, from legal to local actions.
|
Number of land records made publically available in target city with support of the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of ICT systems for land management in target city developed with the support of the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Adopted strategy document
Additional Information:
Please specify ICT system.
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in land management, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities of city authorities to design and implement security measures and strategies |
Number of measures enhancing safety of the target city designed by the government with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
Number of measures enhancing safety of city implemented with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to planning of city measures enhancing safety
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Please specify how contribution of the EU-funded intervention to the planning and implementation is measured.
|
|
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to planning and/or implementation of city measures enhancing safety
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Please specify how contribution of the EU-funded intervention to the planning and implementation is measured.
|
|
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in security measures and strategies, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible.
|
|
Extent to which the EU-funded intervention supported the target city in addressing safety concerns raised by women, people with disabilities, youth, the elderly, indigenous people and other populations
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
OECD National Urban Policy Programme, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/national-urban-policies.htm.
If data are not available, Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please define the population groups relevant for the local context.
|
|
GAP III - Extent to which partner country institutions capacities to fight gender-based violence are increased with EU support
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
OECD National Urban Policy Programme, https://www.oecd.org/cfe/national-urban-policies.htm.
If data are not available, Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to development of security strategy in target city (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention; Test of strategies and policy documents
Additional Information:
|
|
GERF2.23/ EURF 2.29 - Number of state institutions and non-state actors supported on security, border management, countering violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population and human rights (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: (i) interim and final reports from implementing organisations, including governments, international organisations, non-state actors, etc. (ii) ROM reviews and (iii) evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.29. Please specify the area of support, e.g. justice, security, border management, preventing violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population, protection of human rights. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.29_-_state_institutions_and_non-state_actors_clean_180813.pdf |
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Opportunities provided for dialogue and cooperation between city authorities, civilsociety and private sector on urban management |
Extent to which civil society and other partners participate in planning and monitoring the implementation of urban policies with support of the EU-funded intervention
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
The methodology developed by OECD-UNDP Joint Support Team for Global Partnership Monitoring can be utilized as guidance for measuring CSO effectiveness and enabling environment in context of the support of the EU-funded intervention. The relevant methodology is provided under indicator 2: Civil Society Organisations operate within an environment that maximises their engagement in and contribution to development. For more details, please see: https://www.effectivecooperation.org/system/files/2020-10/Indicator2_Se…
|
GERF 2.29/ EURF 2.25 - Number of government policies developed or revised with civil society organisation participation through EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
EURF indicator 2.25. The figures should be disaggregated according to the categories: Sector or crosscutting reform strategies, annual and multi-annual budget and primary and secondary legislation developed/revised with EU support. For more details, please see: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/sites/default/files/2.25-_clean-_policies_with_cso_participation-180808.pdf. |
|
GERF 2.28 - Number of grassroots civil society organisations benefitting from (or reached by) EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
EU intervention monitoring and reporting systems: annual and final reports from implementing organisations (e.g. governments, international organisations, non-state actors), ROM reviews, and evaluations.
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of participants in the consultations on urban policies supported by EU-funded intervention, disaggregated by sex, sector, age, disability status, population group
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
This indicator is relevant at the output level if the EU-funded intervention directly supports organization of consultations on urban policies, otherwise it can be used at the outcome level.
|
|
Level of participation of women, youth, persons with disabilities, the elderly, indigenous people and other populations in development of urban policies supported by the EU-funded intervention (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Database of beneficiaries/participants
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of city representatives participating in development of the national urban policy with support of the EU-funded intervention, disaggregated by sex
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of dialogue mechanisms on specific topics supported by the EU-funded intervention
(Numeric)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies to be conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
Please specify the dialogue mechanism topics.
|
| Result | Indicator(s) |
| Output: Improved capacities of city authorities for integrated urban planning |
Number of beneficiaries trained by the EU-funded intervention with increased knowledge and/or skills in integrated urban planning, disaggregated by sex (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Database of training participants; pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information:
Please specify training topics and target participants as much as possible. If monitoring capacity is limited or the context is fragile, this indicator could be simplified to monitor only the number of persons trained (without referring to an increase in knowledge and/or skills). However, in order to ensure the quality of training and the achievement of the desired result, it is recommended to assess the knowledge of participants before and after the intervention whenever possible. |
Number of measures promoting integrated urban planning that were designed by the government with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Number of measures promoting integrated urban planning that were implemented by the government with EU support (OPSYS core indicator)
Data Source:
Progress reports for the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to planning of measures enhancing urban planning and/or implementation
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
|
|
Extent to which EU-funded intervention contributed to implementation of measures enhancing urban planning and/or implementation
(Qualitative)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data
Additional Information:
|