Results and Indicators
Result | Indicators |
---|---|
Impact
To reduce incidents of violent extremism and support for such actsin location A
|
FPI.IcSP - Number of individuals recruited into terrorist or violent extremist groups or radicalised to support the violent activities of terrorist groups
(Number)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). |
Percentage of people thinking violence is not a mean to reach political objectives and are against the support to violent groups (disaggregated by sex)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention |
|
Level of presence of extremist groups in the target area
()
Data Source:
National statistical report |
|
Country score in the Global Terrorism Index (OPSYS core indicator)
(Score)
Data Source:
Global Terrorism Index, Institute for Economics and Peace, https://www.economicsandpeace.org/research/#measuring-peace
Additional Information
The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) is a report published annually by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP). The index provides a comprehensive summary of the key global trends and patterns in terrorism since 2000. http://economicsandpeace.org/reports/ |
|
Number of incidents of violent extremism in the target country/region/city, per year
(Number of)
Data Source:
National statistical report
Additional Information
Please further clarifiy what kind of incidents are specifically measured. For further information on violent extremism definition please see: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/terrorism/module-2/key-issues/radicalizati… |
Result | Indicators |
---|---|
Specific Objective - Outcome
Individuals identified as “at risk”
demonstrate more desirable attitudes and behaviors |
FPI.IcSP - Number of ‘at-risk’ individuals understanding religious/idological doctrines to be subject to a number of different interpretations (i.e. critical thinking)
(Number)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). It can be expressed as a number or as a percentage but not as both. In case of use of percentage, an estimated total number of the targeted population group needs to be known. |
FPI.IcSP - Number of ‘at-risk’ individuals claiming to acknowledge the legitimacy of the government
(Number)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). It can be expressed as a number or as a percentage but not as both. In case of use of percentage, an estimated total number of the targeted population group needs to be known. |
|
Percentage of radicalised individuals and violent extremist offenders rehabilitated thanks to the EU-funded intervention, who reintegrated into social and family life (disaggregated by sex and age) (OPSYS core indicator)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
Please identify the target group in the local context, specify what type of integration is being monitored (i.e. social/community life, family life, employment, or other), as well as how each sphere will be assessed (in other words, what factors will tell us when a person has been successfully reintegrated into their community or family). |
|
Percentage of 'at risk' individuals claiming violence is not a legitimate expression of religion (disaggregated by sex and age) (OPSYS core indicator)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
Please define the 'at risk' groups in the local context. Sensitive questions about violent extremism should be carefully phrased and adjusted to the context. Softening questions or asking indirectly may help elicit answers and reduce the rate of nonresponse. |
|
Number of individuals from targeted communities who engage in activities aiming to counter and prevent violent extremism (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Number)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention |
|
Percentage of targeted individuals who feel marginalized (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
Please define the targeted individuals in the local context. |
Result | Indicators |
---|---|
Specific Objective - Outcome
Key state (governance and security),
media and non-state actors at national and community levels prevent and address violent extremism |
FPI.IcSP - Extent to which members of targeted community feel connected or trusting of neighbours and government
()
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). Extent could be measured for example according to a scale going from “to a large extent†to “to a limited extent†to “not at allâ€. |
FPI.IcSP - Number of targeted communities who feel that the EU-funded Action has reduced the risk of radicalisation of members of their community
(Number)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). It can be expressed as a number or as a percentage but not as both. In case of use of percentage, an estimated total number of the targeted population group needs to be known. |
|
GERF 2.23/EURF 2.29 - Number of state institutions and non-state actors supported on security, border management, countering violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population and human rights (OPSYS core indicator)
(Number of)
Data Source:
Intervention M&E system
Additional Information
The indicator refers to the number of different state institutions and non-state actors supported in their work in the areas of security, including border management, justice, conflict prevention, countering violent extremism, protection of civilians in crisis situations and safeguarding of human rights. The supported organisations may include the following: Reinforcing human security aims at ensuring the safety/preservation of the population's basic rights in areas at risk of conflict by enhancing for instance access to justice. It is understood to be the implementation of activities in support of all stakeholders contributing either directly (justice actors, gendarmerie, police) or indirectly (women, youth, community organizations, etc.) to the stability of a given area. It may include the following. Examples of support provided to the work of state and non-state organisations may include capacity building (e.g. support to draft strategies and policies, training aimed at more effective and efficient operations or increased knowledge in the areas of justice, security, border management, preventing violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population in crisis situations and safeguarding of and human rights), direct operational support (e.g. provision of equipment, services and infrastructures to internal security forces, support to regional/international human rights/legal institutions such as OHCHR, regional human rights mechanisms or International Criminal Court, etc), or budget support (financial assistance on the basis of specific security indicators that are negotiated with the concerned authorities). |
|
Percentage of prisons addressing violent extremism by managing prisoners and preventing the spreading of violent extremism among the prison population, out of the total number of prisons
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Reports from prisons (possibly collected through baseline and endline surveys to be commissioned by the EU-funded intervention)
Additional Information
If the relevant line ministry does not have data, the EU-funded intervention may need to commission a survey of prisons. |
|
Number of police stations and prisons having a focal point on preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)
(Number)
Data Source:
National statistical report |
|
Number of non-state actors at national and community level active in preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (CVE), representatives (disaggregated by sex)
(Number)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
The actors include civil society organizations, media, religious/community leaders or other relevant actors - please specify the key actors in the local context. |
|
Number of Ministries that take responsibilities for implementation of activities foreseen in the national strategy on Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)
(Number)
Data Source:
National statistical report |
|
Number of investigations of violent extremism (OPSYS core indicator)
(Number)
Data Source:
Reports by CVE units and prosecution offices Ministry/agency administrative data and reports
Additional Information
Please specify the institutions (or at least the types of institutions) carrying out the investigations. |
|
Extent to which national and local media actors or other credible messengers, challenge violent extremist propaganda through their online and offline reporting/communications (OPSYS core indicator)
(Extent to which)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
The trust and credibility questions related to media actors and other credible messengers may be included in the survey since they can provide insight in the effectiveness. |