Skip to main content
banner Countering Violent Extremism

Countering Violent Extremism

Results and Indicators for Development
Peace and Security

Results and Indicators

Result Indicators
Impact
To reduce incidents of violent extremism and support for such actsin location A
FPI.IcSP - Number of individuals recruited into terrorist or violent extremist groups or radicalised to support the violent activities of terrorist groups
(Number)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP).

Percentage of people thinking violence is not a mean to reach political objectives and are against the support to violent groups (disaggregated by sex)
(Percentage)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Level of presence of extremist groups in the target area
()
Data Source:

National statistical report
International public records

Country score in the Global Terrorism Index (OPSYS core indicator)
(Score)
Data Source:

Global Terrorism Index, Institute for Economics and Peace, https://www.economicsandpeace.org/research/#measuring-peace

Additional Information

The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) is a report published annually by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP). The index provides a comprehensive summary of the key global trends and patterns in terrorism since 2000. http://economicsandpeace.org/reports/

Number of incidents of violent extremism in the target country/region/city, per year
(Number of)
Data Source:

National statistical report
Ministry/agency administrative data and reports

Additional Information

Please further clarifiy what kind of incidents are specifically measured. For further information on violent extremism definition please see: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/terrorism/module-2/key-issues/radicalizati…

Result Indicators
Specific Objective - Outcome
Individuals identified as “at risk”
demonstrate more desirable
attitudes and behaviors
FPI.IcSP - Number of ‘at-risk’ individuals understanding religious/idological doctrines to be subject to a number of different interpretations (i.e. critical thinking)
(Number)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). It can be expressed as a number or as a percentage but not as both. In case of use of percentage, an estimated total number of the targeted population group needs to be known.

FPI.IcSP - Number of ‘at-risk’ individuals claiming to acknowledge the legitimacy of the government
(Number)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). It can be expressed as a number or as a percentage but not as both. In case of use of percentage, an estimated total number of the targeted population group needs to be known.

Percentage of radicalised individuals and violent extremist offenders rehabilitated thanks to the EU-funded intervention, who reintegrated into social and family life (disaggregated by sex and age) (OPSYS core indicator)
(Percentage)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

Please identify the target group in the local context, specify what type of integration is being monitored (i.e. social/community life, family life, employment, or other), as well as how each sphere will be assessed (in other words, what factors will tell us when a person has been successfully reintegrated into their community or family).

Percentage of 'at risk' individuals claiming violence is not a legitimate expression of religion (disaggregated by sex and age) (OPSYS core indicator)
(Percentage)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

Please define the 'at risk' groups in the local context. Sensitive questions about violent extremism should be carefully phrased and adjusted to the context. Softening questions or asking indirectly may help elicit answers and reduce the rate of nonresponse.

Number of individuals from targeted communities who engage in activities aiming to counter and prevent violent extremism (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Number)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention
Database of beneficiaries

Percentage of targeted individuals who feel marginalized (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Percentage)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

Please define the targeted individuals in the local context.

Result Indicators
Specific Objective - Outcome
Key state (governance and security),
media and non-state actors at national
and community levels prevent and
address violent extremism
FPI.IcSP - Extent to which members of targeted community feel connected or trusting of neighbours and government
()
Data Source:

Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). Extent could be measured for example according to a scale going from “to a large extent” to “to a limited extent” to “not at all”.

FPI.IcSP - Number of targeted communities who feel that the EU-funded Action has reduced the risk of radicalisation of members of their community
(Number)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

This indicator is included in the list of FPI core indicators for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP). It can be expressed as a number or as a percentage but not as both. In case of use of percentage, an estimated total number of the targeted population group needs to be known.

GERF 2.23/EURF 2.29 - Number of state institutions and non-state actors supported on security, border management, countering violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population and human rights (OPSYS core indicator)
(Number of)
Data Source:

Intervention M&E system

Additional Information

The indicator refers to the number of different state institutions and non-state actors supported in their work in the areas of security, including border management, justice, conflict prevention, countering violent extremism, protection of civilians in crisis situations and safeguarding of human rights. The supported organisations may include the following: 

- State institutions with a formal mandate to ensure safety of the State and its citizens against violence and coercion. This may include police, gendarmerie, paramilitary forces, presidential guards, coast and border guards, customs authorities, environmental guards, etc. 

- Elected and appointed civil authorities responsible for control and oversight of these institutions. This includes the parliament, ministries of defence, interior and foreign affairs, national security agencies, etc. 

- Criminal justice agencies. This includes ministries of justice, prosecutorial and investigation services, the judiciary and courts, human rights bodies such as ombudsmen and independent commissions, etc. 

- Organisations as part of the international human rights and justice mechanisms, e.g. international courts, international/regional humans rights commissions, etc. 

- Non-state actors for example, civil society organizations including professional organisations, non-profit organisations, international non-governmental organisations, media, lobby groups, etc. 

Reinforcing human security aims at ensuring the safety/preservation of the population's basic rights in areas at risk of conflict by enhancing for instance access to justice. It is understood to be the implementation of activities in support of all stakeholders contributing either directly (justice actors, gendarmerie, police) or indirectly (women, youth, community organizations, etc.) to the stability of a given area. It may include the following. 

- Strengthening judicial and prosecutorial institutions; improving the professional collaboration and cooperation between justice and security actors; improving the court system and the case management for criminal cases; human resources development and training, for example for legal professionals, law enforcement and penitentiary personnel; rehabilitation of the legal system particularly in fragile or post-conflict countries in order to align it with best international standards; improving international judicial cooperation in criminal matters. 

- Integrated border management, which is understood as national and international coordination and cooperation among all the relevant authorities and agencies involved in border security and trade facilitation to establish effective, efficient and coordinated border management, in order to reach the objective of open, but well controlled and secure borders (2010 EU “Guidelines for Integrated Border Management in European Commission External Cooperation”) 

- Preventing violent extremisms, which is understood to be the implementation of activities aimed at tackling the root causes of violent extremism (government failure, political, social and economic marginalization, injustice, etc.), including through the reinforcement of a society's resilience.

- Conflict prevention, which is understood to be the implementation of activities (inter/intra community dialogue, trust-building between the state and the population, early warning systems, fighting against impunity, transitional justice and reconciliation, etc.) intentionally trying to impact conflict and peace prospect. 

- Compliance with and promotion of International Humanitarian Law. 

- Protection of civilian population and human rights, which is understood to be direct support to promote and defend civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the rights of women, children, minorities, etc. 

Examples of support provided to the work of state and non-state organisations may include capacity building (e.g. support to draft strategies and policies, training aimed at more effective and efficient operations or increased knowledge in the areas of justice, security, border management, preventing violent extremism, conflict prevention, protection of civilian population in crisis situations and safeguarding of and human rights), direct operational support (e.g. provision of equipment, services and infrastructures to internal security forces, support to regional/international human rights/legal institutions such as OHCHR, regional human rights mechanisms or International Criminal Court, etc), or budget support (financial assistance on the basis of specific security indicators that are negotiated with the concerned authorities).

Percentage of prisons addressing violent extremism by managing prisoners and preventing the spreading of violent extremism among the prison population, out of the total number of prisons
(Percentage)
Data Source:

Reports from prisons (possibly collected through baseline and endline surveys to be commissioned by the EU-funded intervention)

Additional Information

If the relevant line ministry does not have data, the EU-funded intervention may need to commission a survey of prisons.

Number of police stations and prisons having a focal point on preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)
(Number)
Data Source:

National statistical report
Ministry/agency administrative data and reports

Number of non-state actors at national and community level active in preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (CVE), representatives (disaggregated by sex)
(Number)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline surveys conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

The actors include civil society organizations, media, religious/community leaders or other relevant actors - please specify the key actors in the local context.

Number of Ministries that take responsibilities for implementation of activities foreseen in the national strategy on Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)
(Number)
Data Source:

National statistical report
Ministry/agency administrative data and reports

Number of investigations of violent extremism (OPSYS core indicator)
(Number)
Data Source:

Reports by CVE units and prosecution offices

Ministry/agency administrative data and reports

Additional Information

Please specify the institutions (or at least the types of institutions) carrying out the investigations.

Extent to which national and local media actors or other credible messengers, challenge violent extremist propaganda through their online and offline reporting/communications (OPSYS core indicator)
(Extent to which)
Data Source:

Baseline and endline studies conducted and budgeted by the EU-funded intervention

Additional Information

The trust and credibility questions related to media actors and other credible messengers may be included in the survey since they can provide insight in the effectiveness.