Results and Indicators
Result | Indicators |
---|---|
Impact
To ensure human security
at individual and community level |
Number of robberies per 1,000 residents
(Number of)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data and reports
Additional Information
Please further define robbery in accordance with the national legislation. |
Incidence of misdemeanour offences per capita
(Number of)
Data Source:
Ministry/agency administrative data and reports
Additional Information
Please further define misdemeanour in accordance with the national legislation. |
|
Number of terrorist attacks designated as such by the government of the country
(Number of)
Data Source:
Government press releases
Additional Information
Please provide the definition used for categorization of the terrorist attacks. |
|
SDG 16.1.1. Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Number of)
Data Source:
National sources: Â a) criminal justice system and; b) public health/civil registration. Â
Additional Information
SDG Indicator 16.1.1 (Tier I). This indicator is widely used at national and international level to measure the most extreme form of violent crime and it also provides a direct indication of lack of security. It is calculated as the total number of victims of intentional homicide recorded in a given year divided by the total resident population in the same year, multiplied by 100,000. For a detailed methodology of the SDG indicator please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=16&Target=16.1 |
|
SDG 16.1.2. Number of conflict-related deaths per 100,000 population (disaggregated by sex, age and cause)
(Number of)
Data Source:
Global SDG Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database
Additional Information
SDG Indicator 16.1.2. Tear II. This indicator is defined as the total count of conflict-related deaths divided by the total population, expressed per 100,000 population. |
|
EURF - Country ranking according to the Rule of Law Dimension of the Worldwide Governance Indicators
(Ranking)
Data Source:
World Bank Report on Rule of Law http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#reports
Additional Information
This is an EURF Level 1 indicator. The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project reports aggregate and individual governance indicators for over 200 countries and territories over the period 1996–2016, for six dimensions of governance: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, Control of Corruption. |
|
Country ranking according to the Political Stability and Absence of Violence Dimension of the Worldwide Governance Indicators
(Ranking)
Data Source:
World Bank Report on Political Stability and Absence of Violence Dimension http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#reports
Additional Information
The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project reports aggregate and individual governance indicators for over 200 countries and territories over the period 1996–2016, for six dimensions of governance: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, Control of Corruption. |
|
Security Apparatus Country Score according to the Fragile State Index
(Score)
Data Source:
Fund for Peace, Fragile State Index http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/indicators/c1/
Additional Information
The Fragile States Index, developed in 2005 by a United States think-tank, the Fund for Peace, and the magazine Foreign Policy, is an annual ranking of 178 nations based on their levels of stability and the pressures they face. The Index is based on The Fund for Peace’s proprietary Conflict Assessment System Tool (CAST) analytical platform. The ranking is based on total scores in a number of dimensions, such as demographic pressure, uneven economics development and others, for which there are also specific scores. |
|
Human Rights and Rule of Law Country Score according to the Fragile State Index
(Score)
Data Source:
 Fund for Peace, Fragile State Index  http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/indicators/p3/
Additional Information
The Fragile States Index, developed in 2005 by a United States think-tank, the Fund for Peace, and the magazine Foreign Policy, is an annual ranking of 178 nations based on their levels of stability and the pressures they face. The Index is based on The Fund for Peace’s proprietary Conflict Assessment System Tool (CAST) analytical platform. The ranking is based on total scores in a number of dimensions, such as demographic pressure, uneven economics development and others, for which there are also specific scores. |
|
Group Grievances Country Score according to the Fragile State Index
(Score)
Data Source:
Fund for Peace's - Fragile State Index http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/indicators/
Additional Information
The Fragile States Index, developed in 2005 by a United States think-tank, the Fund for Peace, and the magazine Foreign Policy, is an annual ranking of 178 nations based on their levels of stability and the pressures they face. The Index is based on The Fund for Peace’s proprietary Conflict Assessment System Tool (CAST) analytical platform. The ranking is based on total scores in a number of dimensions, such as demographic pressure, uneven economics development and others, for which there are also specific scores. |
|
Order and Security Country Score according to the World Justice Project
(Score)
Data Source:
WJP World Justice Project  - Order and Security https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index
Additional Information
Factor 5 - Order and Security measures how well the society assures the security of persons and property. This factor includes three dimensions that cover various threats to order and security: crime (5.1 particularly conventional crime), political violence (5.2 including terrorism, armed conflict, and political unrest), and violence as a socially acceptable means to redress personal grievances (5.3 vigilante justice). |
|
Fundamental Rights Country Score according to the World Justice Project
(Score)
Data Source:
WJP World Justice Project  - Rule of Law Index https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index
Additional Information
The World Justice Project (WJP) Rule of Law Index is the world’s leading source for original data on the rule of law. The 2016 edition covers 113 countries and jurisdictions, relying on more than 100,000 household and expert surveys to measure how the rule of law is experienced in practical, everyday situations by the general public worldwide. Factor 4- Fundamental Rights of the Rule of Law Index measures the protection of fundamental human rights. It encompasses adherence to the following fundamental rights: effective enforcement of laws that ensure equal protection,  the right to life and security of the person (possibly the most relevant one for SSR ADs),  due process of law and the rights of the accused,  freedom of opinion and expression , freedom of belief and religion, the right to privacy, freedom of assembly and association, and fundamental labour rights, including the right to collective bargaining, the prohibition of forced and child labour, and the elimination of discrimination. |
|
Country status as fragile according to the OECD Fragility Index
()
Data Source:
OECD States of Fragility Reports, http://www.oecd.org/dac/conflict-fragility-resilience/listofstateoffrag…
Additional Information
The OECD characterises fragility as the accumulation and combination of risks combined with insufficient capacity by the state, system, and/or communities to manage it, absorb it, or mitigate its consequences; the approach is based on the five dimensions deemed most relevant for measuring and identifying fragility: economic, environmental, political, security and societal. Each dimension is evaluated according to a number of indicators that measure the most important facets of risks and coping capacities relevant to fragility. The overall value or disaggregated values for one of the dimensions can be looked at, depending on needs. The scale for dimensions is divided in five segments between severe and minor. |
|
Country based Security Perception Indexes
(Score)
Data Source:
National Surveys
Additional Information
It is advisable to refer to country based Perception Indexes when available. |
Result | Indicators |
---|---|
Specific Objective - Outcome
Enhanced reconciliation and
reintegration into the communities of ex-combatants in post-conflict and fragile context |
Percentage of ex-combatants who were effectively integrated into their communities, out of the number of ex-combatants having abandoned an armed group who received support from the EU intervention (disaggregated by sex and age) (OPSYS core indicator)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline community surveys to be conducted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
Please define what "effectively integrated" means in the local context, i.e. finding employment, finding a fixed residence. Data collection in this field is sensitive and methodology and implementation of the baseline and endline surveys should be adjusted accordingly. |
Number of ex-combatants having abandoned an armed group (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Number of)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline community surveys conducted by the EU-funded intervention
Additional Information
Community and religious leaders may be a good source of information for collecting data. Data collection in this field is sensitive and methodology and implementation of survey should be adjusted accordingly. |
Result | Indicators |
---|---|
Specific Objective - Outcome
Reduced crime rates related directlyto physical safety, incl. humantrafficking, kidnappings, homicides,assaults, armed robberies, SGBV,etc.
|
SDG 16.1.1. Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Number)
Data Source:
Database of training participants; pre- and post-training tests
Additional Information
SDG Indicator 16.1.1 (Tier I). This indicator is widely used at national and international level to measure the most extreme form of violent crime and it also provides a direct indication of lack of security. It is calculated as the total number of victims of intentional homicide recorded in a given year divided by the total resident population in the same year, multiplied by 100,000. For a detailed methodology of the SDG indicator please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=16&Target=16.1 |
Proportion of population that feel safe walking alone around the area they live
(Percentage)
Data Source:
UNODC data portal, https://dataunodc.un.org/
Additional Information
 |
|
Percentage of migrants held in detention centres while their asylum claims are being assessed (disaggregated by sex and age)
(Percentage)
Data Source:
Baseline and endline Ministry of Interior records requested by the EU-funded intervention |
|
SDG 16.2.2. Number of victims of human trafficking per 100,000 population (disaggregated by sex, age and form of exploitation)
(Number of)
Data Source:
National sources: national authorities competent in detecting trafficking victims, law enforcement institutions, or services assisting the victims.
Additional Information
SDG indicator 16.2.2 (Tier I). The indicator will be calculated as the ratio between the sum of detected and undetected victims of trafficking and the population resident in the country, multiplied by 100,000, For a detailed methodology of the SDG indicator please see: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=16&Target=16.2 |